1
00:00:07,040 --> 00:00:08,174
That is the most

2
00:00:08,174 --> 00:00:11,144
distant individual star
that has been seen so far.

3
00:00:11,945 --> 00:00:14,280
It's so far away that it exists at a time

4
00:00:14,280 --> 00:00:17,317
that the universe
was only about 900 million years old

5
00:00:17,617 --> 00:00:21,421
as compared to its current age,
which is about 13.8 billion years.

6
00:00:21,721 --> 00:00:25,258
So we're really looking back into a time
when the universe was much different

7
00:00:25,258 --> 00:00:26,526
than it is today.

8
00:00:26,526 --> 00:00:30,230
And being able to see an individual star
at this time is really exciting.

9
00:00:30,463 --> 00:00:33,433
We've been able to see entire galaxies
at this distance, but

10
00:00:33,433 --> 00:00:36,669
that's the light from millions of stars
all blended together.

11
00:00:36,903 --> 00:00:40,540
So being able to pick out just this one
individual star is really exciting,

12
00:00:40,540 --> 00:00:44,110
and it gives us a really awesome
opportunity to study it in a lot of detail

13
00:00:44,344 --> 00:00:47,247
and get a better sense of what stars
in the early universe look like.

14
00:00:52,052 --> 00:00:55,255
Hubble was able
to see this thanks to its incredible power

15
00:00:55,255 --> 00:01:00,393
and also the assistance from a cosmic
telescope known as a gravitational lens.

16
00:01:00,760 --> 00:01:04,531
So there's a very massive cluster of
galaxies that's sitting in the foreground,

17
00:01:04,864 --> 00:01:08,068
and that cluster
actually bends the space around it.

18
00:01:08,334 --> 00:01:12,639
And as the light from this background
galaxy travels through that bend space,

19
00:01:12,939 --> 00:01:16,943
it gets magnified and distorted
as it goes through this bend space.

20
00:01:17,444 --> 00:01:20,780
And what that gives us
is an image of the galaxy

21
00:01:20,780 --> 00:01:23,716
that's spread out into this long,
crescent shaped arc

22
00:01:23,983 --> 00:01:27,353
that's much brighter
than we could normally see this galaxy.

23
00:01:27,687 --> 00:01:32,792
And in particular, in one unique spot,
the magnification that we get from

24
00:01:32,792 --> 00:01:36,696
this gravitational lensing effect
really increases dramatically.

25
00:01:36,696 --> 00:01:39,566
And the star just happens
to be sitting right at that point

26
00:01:39,833 --> 00:01:42,435
where it's magnified
by a factor of several thousand.

27
00:01:42,769 --> 00:01:46,773
So it's really highly magnified,
which is the way that we're able

28
00:01:46,773 --> 00:01:50,743
to pick out the light from just this one
individual star among this this

29
00:01:50,743 --> 00:01:51,778
entire galaxy.

30
00:01:57,584 --> 00:01:58,051
So when we

31
00:01:58,051 --> 00:02:02,655
look out at distant objects, because light
travels at a finite speed, it

32
00:02:02,655 --> 00:02:06,526
takes that light a certain amount of time
to get from its source to us.

33
00:02:06,960 --> 00:02:09,762
And as we look into more and more distant
objects,

34
00:02:09,762 --> 00:02:12,699
we're basically
looking into the ever more distant past

35
00:02:12,999 --> 00:02:17,103
as we look at things that are emitting
light billions of years ago.

36
00:02:17,570 --> 00:02:21,007
So in this particular case,
the object is so distant

37
00:02:21,007 --> 00:02:26,112
that if the light came from it
only 900 million years after the Big Bang.

38
00:02:26,112 --> 00:02:30,016
So it's been traveling towards us
for about 12.8 billion years.

39
00:02:30,850 --> 00:02:33,119
So we're really
this really gives us a window

40
00:02:33,119 --> 00:02:37,357
into what the universe
was like that back in that early day.

41
00:02:37,357 --> 00:02:40,894
And it looks at the universe we know
looks a lot different back at that point.

42
00:02:40,894 --> 00:02:44,797
So the opportunity to study this one
individual star

43
00:02:44,797 --> 00:02:48,701
at this really early stage of the universe
is really exciting and really gives us a

44
00:02:48,701 --> 00:02:52,972
unique view into how the universe worked
and how these stars formed and came to be

45
00:02:56,776 --> 00:02:58,244
in the universe.

46
00:02:58,244 --> 00:03:00,446
Hubble and Webb
are going to be incredibly complementary.

47
00:03:00,480 --> 00:03:05,018
So Hubble is designed to look at
the ultraviolet and optical wavelengths.

48
00:03:05,385 --> 00:03:08,621
That's bluer light than what we can see
with our eyes in the ultraviolet.

49
00:03:08,855 --> 00:03:11,624
And then optical is the light that we see
with our own eyes.

50
00:03:12,392 --> 00:03:15,461
Meanwhile, the Webb telescope was designed
to look into the infrared.

51
00:03:15,461 --> 00:03:18,064
So that's light that's redder than what
we can see with our own eyes.

52
00:03:18,331 --> 00:03:21,701
So together they give a really complete
picture across this broad

53
00:03:21,935 --> 00:03:26,272
range of wavelengths for all these distant
objects that we can look at.

54
00:03:26,272 --> 00:03:30,210
And each both of them together
can do a much better job

55
00:03:30,210 --> 00:03:33,246
than either one could do on their own.

56
00:03:36,716 --> 00:03:37,450
You can learn more

57
00:03:37,450 --> 00:03:42,021
at nasa.gov/Hubble
or follow on social media @NASAHubble

58
00:03:46,726 --> 00:03:48,795
So we
know that this is a very massive star.

59
00:03:48,795 --> 00:03:51,831
We have it
at least 50 times the mass of the sun,

60
00:03:52,131 --> 00:03:55,535
which is much larger than a typical star
in the local universe.

61
00:03:56,169 --> 00:03:58,972
There are certainly examples
of stars of this mass,

62
00:03:58,972 --> 00:04:01,474
but they're not nearly as common
as much smaller stars.

63
00:04:02,041 --> 00:04:05,612
We expect that in the distant universe,
these massive stars might be a little bit

64
00:04:05,612 --> 00:04:06,279
more common.

65
00:04:06,279 --> 00:04:09,349
So being able to study one
directly is going to be really exciting.

66
00:04:09,882 --> 00:04:14,087
We also know that in the early universe,
the chemical composition

67
00:04:14,087 --> 00:04:16,923
of stars might look
a little bit different than it does today.

68
00:04:17,190 --> 00:04:20,460
So there haven't there hasn't
been as much time for multiple generations

69
00:04:20,460 --> 00:04:23,730
of stars to live and die
and enrich the surrounding

70
00:04:23,730 --> 00:04:26,666
environment with the heavier elements
that they produce.

71
00:04:27,033 --> 00:04:31,771
So being able to study this massive star
at a time when the universe was made up

72
00:04:31,771 --> 00:04:34,807
of slightly different
materials is going to be really exciting

73
00:04:34,807 --> 00:04:38,478
and a really great way
to figure out how these stars are forming

74
00:04:38,478 --> 00:04:41,581
and what they look like
and how they live and how they evolve

75
00:04:46,619 --> 00:04:47,720
Hubble is doing great.

76
00:04:47,720 --> 00:04:50,723
It is continuing to make fascinating
discoveries.

77
00:04:50,723 --> 00:04:54,861
It's continuing to collect
amazing observations of the universe,

78
00:04:54,861 --> 00:04:57,463
and we have a great team of people
that's working on it,

79
00:04:57,730 --> 00:05:01,334
and we really do expect it to continue
to make groundbreaking discoveries

80
00:05:01,334 --> 00:05:03,002
for years to come

81
00:05:07,206 --> 00:05:10,143
I am definitely most looking forward
to my own observations.

82
00:05:10,143 --> 00:05:14,881
So we have Hubble and Webb time
as scheduled for this coming year

83
00:05:14,881 --> 00:05:20,119
to look at this lens star though,
and it's the combination of the two

84
00:05:20,119 --> 00:05:23,356
is going to be really exciting
to get a much better constraint on

85
00:05:23,656 --> 00:05:28,027
what the star looks like and what it was
formed from and what type of star it is.

86
00:05:28,027 --> 00:05:30,396
So I'm definitely most excited for those

87
00:05:34,500 --> 00:05:34,967
things.

88
00:05:35,868 --> 00:05:38,204
Yeah, we nicknamed the star Earendel,

89
00:05:38,204 --> 00:05:40,907
which is an old English word
that means Morning Star.

90
00:05:41,274 --> 00:05:44,243
So this this epic of the universe

91
00:05:44,577 --> 00:05:47,113
is generally referred to as Cosmic Dawn.

92
00:05:47,847 --> 00:05:49,982
Since it's the time when these first stars
are starting

93
00:05:49,982 --> 00:05:52,785
to form in the first galaxies
or taking shape and sort of the

94
00:05:53,052 --> 00:05:55,955
the first light of the universe
is just breaking through.

95
00:05:56,923 --> 00:05:58,891
So we figured that

96
00:05:58,891 --> 00:06:01,861
a morning star
nickname would fit in really well.

97
00:06:02,495 --> 00:06:04,764
And I liked the way
that Earendel sounded.

98
00:06:05,098 --> 00:06:08,434
It is also the old English word
that J.R.R.

99
00:06:08,434 --> 00:06:12,939
Tolkien used as the name of a character
from his Silmarillion.

100
00:06:13,306 --> 00:06:16,142
So I'm a huge Tolkien fan as well,

101
00:06:16,142 --> 00:06:19,112
so that symmetry fit in really well,

102
00:06:19,712 --> 00:06:21,914
and it just seemed like
a really great choice for the name

103
00:06:27,153 --> 00:06:29,222
we were looking at the galaxy

104
00:06:29,222 --> 00:06:32,425
originally, so the lens galaxy
that the star is a part of.

105
00:06:32,725 --> 00:06:33,559
As I mentioned,

106
00:06:33,559 --> 00:06:34,694
with gravitational lensing,

107
00:06:34,694 --> 00:06:37,897
it spreads these galaxies
out into these long crescent shaped arcs.

108
00:06:38,231 --> 00:06:41,768
And this particular one
was the longest arc that had been seen

109
00:06:42,301 --> 00:06:45,104
of a galaxy that was within the first
billion years of the universe.

110
00:06:45,138 --> 00:06:47,940
So it seemed like
a really interesting galaxy to study.

111
00:06:47,974 --> 00:06:48,908
And then we just kind of

112
00:06:48,908 --> 00:06:52,845
stumbled on to the star
as we were modeling the lensing effect.

113
00:06:52,879 --> 00:06:56,849
It turned out that our models kept
predicting that at this one point,

114
00:06:56,849 --> 00:07:01,320
this one bright point on the arc
was going to be very highly magnified.

115
00:07:01,921 --> 00:07:03,322
We almost didn't believe it at first.

116
00:07:03,322 --> 00:07:05,391
It seemed almost too good to be true.

117
00:07:05,391 --> 00:07:09,662
But as we kept making more models
and double and triple checking,

118
00:07:09,662 --> 00:07:12,231
it just kept holding up
that this one particular spot

119
00:07:12,765 --> 00:07:15,067
was only consistent
with being a lensed star

120
00:07:20,006 --> 00:07:22,241
I would say it is very unlikely.

121
00:07:22,241 --> 00:07:26,312
So we know from stars
in the local universe that we don't tend

122
00:07:26,312 --> 00:07:28,948
to see planets
around the most massive stars.

123
00:07:29,549 --> 00:07:32,285
This could
partially be an observation effect

124
00:07:32,285 --> 00:07:35,988
because it's harder to spot planets around
much larger, much brighter stars.

125
00:07:36,422 --> 00:07:39,792
But it's also possible
that these more massive stars

126
00:07:39,792 --> 00:07:43,696
are just too large and the light from them
is just too powerful

127
00:07:43,963 --> 00:07:47,900
to allow planets
to form Also, back in the early universe,

128
00:07:47,900 --> 00:07:52,472
the materials that you need to make up
these planets were much less abundant.

129
00:07:52,839 --> 00:07:55,608
So it would be a lot less likely

130
00:07:55,608 --> 00:07:59,312
that we could actually form a planet
at back at this early time.

131
00:07:59,712 --> 00:08:01,013
And as far as life goes,

132
00:08:01,013 --> 00:08:04,650
only 900 million years after the Big Bang
is not a whole lot of time.

133
00:08:05,318 --> 00:08:09,388
Cosmically speaking, at least to
to form anything as complicated as life.

134
00:08:09,422 --> 00:08:11,891
So I would say that it's pretty unlikely.