1 00:00:10,427 --> 00:00:12,145 Hello and welcome to this press 2 00:00:12,145 --> 00:00:14,597 briefing on the James Webb Space Telescope. 3 00:00:14,998 --> 00:00:15,949 I'm Karen Fox. 4 00:00:15,949 --> 00:00:18,151 With NASA's Office of Communications. 5 00:00:18,151 --> 00:00:18,985 And we are here today 6 00:00:18,985 --> 00:00:22,522 at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, 7 00:00:22,789 --> 00:00:25,108 to talk about the latest update on the Webb Telescope, 8 00:00:25,308 --> 00:00:27,827 which is all about aligning the mirrors. 9 00:00:27,827 --> 00:00:31,047 We will be taking Q&A from the media on the line. 10 00:00:31,281 --> 00:00:32,582 After some talks 11 00:00:32,582 --> 00:00:35,785 today, you can get in the queue by dialing Star One. 12 00:00:36,169 --> 00:00:38,071 We are also taking social media questions. 13 00:00:38,071 --> 00:00:41,191 Just post your question using the hashtag unfold the universe 14 00:00:41,391 --> 00:00:43,877 and we'll be taking some of those along the way as well. 15 00:00:44,778 --> 00:00:46,913 We are going to start out with Thomas Zurbuchen, 16 00:00:47,097 --> 00:00:50,400 the associate administrator for science at NASA headquarters 17 00:00:50,400 --> 00:00:52,802 in Washington, D.C.. Welcome. 18 00:00:52,802 --> 00:00:53,870 So glad to be here. 19 00:00:53,870 --> 00:00:55,972 What a day can It's exciting. 20 00:00:56,005 --> 00:00:57,240 Tell us why we're here. 21 00:00:57,240 --> 00:00:58,258 Well, look, 22 00:00:58,258 --> 00:01:00,477 this is one of the most magnificent days 23 00:01:00,477 --> 00:01:01,861 in my whole career right now. 24 00:01:01,861 --> 00:01:04,431 So frankly, and for many of us astronomers 25 00:01:04,647 --> 00:01:07,233 one of the most important days that we've had. 26 00:01:07,767 --> 00:01:10,887 Because even though there's still weeks and months 27 00:01:10,887 --> 00:01:13,623 ahead to really fully unleash the power 28 00:01:13,623 --> 00:01:15,892 of this new observatories orbiter at L2, 29 00:01:16,309 --> 00:01:18,978 today we can announce that the optics 30 00:01:18,978 --> 00:01:21,865 will perform to specifications or even better. 31 00:01:21,981 --> 00:01:24,000 It's an amazing achievement. 32 00:01:24,601 --> 00:01:25,368 Fantastic. 33 00:01:25,368 --> 00:01:27,887 Tell us a little more about how we got here. 34 00:01:27,921 --> 00:01:29,572 What brought us to this day? 35 00:01:29,572 --> 00:01:32,041 This has been a journey for over two decades. 36 00:01:32,041 --> 00:01:34,644 And I go and look at this team. 37 00:01:34,644 --> 00:01:37,347 They're sitting there right now, and each and every 38 00:01:37,347 --> 00:01:40,166 one of them is so important from different organizations 39 00:01:40,166 --> 00:01:44,087 from Goddard Space Telescope, Northrop Grumman Ball, which 40 00:01:44,637 --> 00:01:47,090 spend work on this, and other contractors, 41 00:01:47,090 --> 00:01:49,192 other participants from all around. 42 00:01:49,859 --> 00:01:53,513 But for everyone who sits there, there's tens, hundreds 43 00:01:53,963 --> 00:01:57,617 that have contributed to this from the idea stage 44 00:01:57,767 --> 00:02:00,436 20 plus two years ago with ten plus 45 00:02:00,436 --> 00:02:02,972 new technologies that had to be invented 46 00:02:03,590 --> 00:02:07,410 coming up with this fragmented mirror 21 feet across 47 00:02:07,410 --> 00:02:11,147 18 pieces at the flatness not conceived before 48 00:02:11,664 --> 00:02:14,033 and now putting it together 49 00:02:14,033 --> 00:02:17,036 to get to this place of course launching from Kourou 50 00:02:17,036 --> 00:02:18,688 together with our international partners, 51 00:02:18,688 --> 00:02:21,741 deploying it seamlessly in space and now 52 00:02:21,741 --> 00:02:24,611 aligning that optics it's great. 53 00:02:24,627 --> 00:02:26,729 I've heard you talk a lot about this team 54 00:02:26,729 --> 00:02:28,481 and your admiration for this team. 55 00:02:28,481 --> 00:02:31,017 And my understanding is this is really the first time 56 00:02:31,017 --> 00:02:33,086 we have ever done this where we've had to hold a mirror 57 00:02:33,086 --> 00:02:35,939 and put it up into the fairing before launch. 58 00:02:36,239 --> 00:02:38,725 And to talk me through that a little bit. 59 00:02:38,758 --> 00:02:39,325 What? What? 60 00:02:40,793 --> 00:02:42,962 How much had to be conceived and brought to where we are? 61 00:02:43,530 --> 00:02:46,199 Look, I mean, when we have a mission, normally 62 00:02:46,199 --> 00:02:49,068 elsewhere in our portfolio, we think of like one or two. 63 00:02:49,369 --> 00:02:52,705 I call them miracles, you know, kind of new ideas, entirely new 64 00:02:52,705 --> 00:02:56,276 technologies that when we start, we don't know yet 65 00:02:56,276 --> 00:02:59,395 whether they're going to work this telescope. 66 00:02:59,395 --> 00:03:01,981 This observatory now had ten of them, 67 00:03:01,981 --> 00:03:04,200 perhaps even 12, depending on how you count. 68 00:03:04,801 --> 00:03:09,172 And you should know that the ingenuity of the entire team, 69 00:03:09,172 --> 00:03:11,941 you know, the diverse team that came together the best 70 00:03:11,941 --> 00:03:14,727 that they offer from the international community 71 00:03:15,228 --> 00:03:16,012 got us here. 72 00:03:16,012 --> 00:03:18,531 You know, for me, when I think about this, frankly, 73 00:03:18,831 --> 00:03:21,050 I've said it before, I'm saying it again. 74 00:03:21,050 --> 00:03:23,636 I think of that in amazing 75 00:03:23,636 --> 00:03:26,789 challenge, really at the edge of what's possible. 76 00:03:27,140 --> 00:03:29,325 And they did it in a way that, frankly, 77 00:03:29,342 --> 00:03:32,629 to outside observers make it look easy. 78 00:03:32,962 --> 00:03:36,366 And what people should see is not that it's easy. 79 00:03:36,416 --> 00:03:38,301 It will be far from the truth. 80 00:03:38,301 --> 00:03:41,387 I've lost sleepless nights, awkwardness, 81 00:03:41,838 --> 00:03:43,890 this particular step, but also outer step 82 00:03:43,890 --> 00:03:46,409 that this team put behind them in a fashion. 83 00:03:46,409 --> 00:03:47,093 What you should see 84 00:03:47,093 --> 00:03:50,663 is just the amazing quality of a team coming together, 85 00:03:50,663 --> 00:03:54,567 United behind a purpose and, you know, desire 86 00:03:54,567 --> 00:03:57,203 to see the universe in ways we've never seen before. 87 00:03:58,171 --> 00:03:59,722 So what's next? 88 00:03:59,822 --> 00:04:02,392 Well, so this team is going forward. 89 00:04:02,392 --> 00:04:04,861 It's doing the entire optics alignment 90 00:04:05,478 --> 00:04:07,280 continuing and finalizing it. 91 00:04:07,280 --> 00:04:08,932 And then, of course, it's all about instruments. 92 00:04:08,932 --> 00:04:10,817 Now we need to turn on these instruments 93 00:04:10,817 --> 00:04:13,286 and all the modes that are there, kind of 94 00:04:13,369 --> 00:04:15,872 somewhere in the summer, June-July, perhaps. 95 00:04:15,872 --> 00:04:18,775 You know, we're going to have kind of these modes there. 96 00:04:18,808 --> 00:04:23,313 We're going to be ready to really show that the universe 97 00:04:23,313 --> 00:04:23,997 that we've not 98 00:04:23,997 --> 00:04:27,150 seen in that infrared universe at that resolution. 99 00:04:27,467 --> 00:04:28,668 And then, frankly, 100 00:04:28,668 --> 00:04:30,837 what we're most excited about is turning it over 101 00:04:30,837 --> 00:04:33,740 to the science community to let that discovery 102 00:04:33,840 --> 00:04:36,109 begin at a level we've never seen before. 103 00:04:36,993 --> 00:04:37,977 Thank you so much. 104 00:04:37,977 --> 00:04:39,929 We really appreciate it. Thank you. 105 00:04:39,929 --> 00:04:42,899 We are going to keep Thomas here. 106 00:04:42,899 --> 00:04:45,051 He'll be here for the question and answer portion. 107 00:04:45,268 --> 00:04:48,888 But for now, we are moving on to the rest of the panel. 108 00:04:49,188 --> 00:04:50,940 We have a great panel here. For you today. 109 00:04:50,940 --> 00:04:53,660 We have Eileen Fineberg, who is the Webb Optical 110 00:04:53,660 --> 00:04:57,113 Telescope Element Manager here at NASA Goddard. 111 00:04:57,413 --> 00:05:00,383 We have Aaron Wolfe, who is the Web program manager 112 00:05:00,383 --> 00:05:03,303 at Ball Aerospace in Broomfield, Colorado. 113 00:05:03,536 --> 00:05:06,589 Marshall Perron, the deputy telescope scientist 114 00:05:06,589 --> 00:05:09,442 at the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore. 115 00:05:09,442 --> 00:05:10,193 Maryland. 116 00:05:10,193 --> 00:05:13,162 And Jane Rigby, who is the Web Operations 117 00:05:13,162 --> 00:05:16,432 Project Scientist also here at NASA Goddard. 118 00:05:16,432 --> 00:05:18,267 We're going to start off with Lee. 119 00:05:18,267 --> 00:05:21,087 He's going to tell us a little bit more about this alignment. 120 00:05:22,555 --> 00:05:23,222 Thank you, Karen. 121 00:05:23,222 --> 00:05:24,090 Well, we have now 122 00:05:24,090 --> 00:05:26,359 finished the fourth and fifth phases 123 00:05:26,359 --> 00:05:27,527 of the telescope alignment. 124 00:05:27,527 --> 00:05:30,413 We call those phases course phasing in fine phasing. 125 00:05:30,830 --> 00:05:33,116 And that's where we've made the primary mirror 126 00:05:33,116 --> 00:05:36,169 all 18 mirror segments into a single primary mirror. 127 00:05:36,536 --> 00:05:38,521 And we will initially align the telescope 128 00:05:38,521 --> 00:05:39,772 to the near cam instrument. 129 00:05:39,772 --> 00:05:41,958 That's the instrument that we use to do the alignment. 130 00:05:42,475 --> 00:05:45,144 And and we've taken our first images. 131 00:05:45,144 --> 00:05:45,661 In fact, 132 00:05:45,661 --> 00:05:47,430 the team gathered over the weekend 133 00:05:47,430 --> 00:05:49,198 when the first images came down. 134 00:05:49,198 --> 00:05:51,084 We were in the mission control center. 135 00:05:51,084 --> 00:05:53,403 And it was a very emotional moment. 136 00:05:53,753 --> 00:05:57,206 We kind of blew this some of the images of stars up 137 00:05:57,206 --> 00:05:59,392 and really could see how it was performing. 138 00:05:59,842 --> 00:06:02,395 And I'm happy to say that the optical performance 139 00:06:02,395 --> 00:06:04,680 of the telescope is absolutely phenomenal. 140 00:06:04,731 --> 00:06:07,083 It is really working extremely well. 141 00:06:07,517 --> 00:06:10,286 And and we said last fall that we would know 142 00:06:10,286 --> 00:06:11,988 that the telescope is working properly 143 00:06:11,988 --> 00:06:14,807 when we have an image of a star that looks like a star. 144 00:06:15,324 --> 00:06:16,859 And and now we have that. 145 00:06:16,859 --> 00:06:18,511 And you're seeing that image 146 00:06:18,511 --> 00:06:20,997 This is actually a 2100 second exposure 147 00:06:21,748 --> 00:06:24,600 taken at roughly two microns, which is the wavelength 148 00:06:24,600 --> 00:06:27,687 which Webb was designed to work at or above 149 00:06:28,037 --> 00:06:30,990 and you not only see the star and the spikes 150 00:06:30,990 --> 00:06:31,224 from the 151 00:06:31,224 --> 00:06:32,842 diffraction of the star, but you see 152 00:06:32,842 --> 00:06:35,128 other stars in the field that are tightly focused, 153 00:06:35,428 --> 00:06:37,997 just like we expect and all sorts of other 154 00:06:37,997 --> 00:06:40,666 interesting structure in the background. 155 00:06:40,666 --> 00:06:41,367 We've actually done 156 00:06:41,367 --> 00:06:44,570 very detailed analysis of the images we're getting. 157 00:06:44,871 --> 00:06:47,957 And so far, what we're finding is that the performance is 158 00:06:48,241 --> 00:06:52,011 as good, if not better, than our most optimistic predictions. 159 00:06:52,011 --> 00:06:53,930 So we're really pleased with that. 160 00:06:53,930 --> 00:06:57,200 And to give you some perspective of what has happened 161 00:06:57,200 --> 00:06:58,801 and sort of how the telescope got here, 162 00:06:58,801 --> 00:07:01,521 we want to run this video clip to kind of show you 163 00:07:01,854 --> 00:07:03,990 what the telescope has been through to get to this point. 164 00:07:06,142 --> 00:07:06,926 Webb's science 165 00:07:06,926 --> 00:07:09,378 objectives required a large primary mirror, 166 00:07:09,479 --> 00:07:12,115 a mirror too large to fit inside the largest rocket 167 00:07:12,115 --> 00:07:13,583 fairing that exists. 168 00:07:13,583 --> 00:07:15,952 So we had to design Webb's optics to be folded 169 00:07:18,204 --> 00:07:19,822 This meant Webb's Mirror segments 170 00:07:19,822 --> 00:07:21,407 had to be extremely lightweight 171 00:07:21,407 --> 00:07:22,975 and individually controllable 172 00:07:22,975 --> 00:07:25,611 so they could be aligned in space. 173 00:07:25,611 --> 00:07:28,197 We put everything through rigorous testing to ensure 174 00:07:28,197 --> 00:07:31,017 Webb's delicate systems would survive, launch 175 00:07:31,017 --> 00:07:33,085 and work in the super cold vacuum of space. 176 00:07:33,719 --> 00:07:36,873 Webb's cryogenic test inside Chamber A at the Johnson 177 00:07:36,873 --> 00:07:40,309 Space Center in Houston in 20, 17, five years ago 178 00:07:40,610 --> 00:07:43,196 was actually the last time we tested the telescope 179 00:07:43,412 --> 00:07:45,381 or took images with the near Kim instrument, 180 00:07:45,381 --> 00:07:47,416 which is used to align the mirrors 181 00:07:47,416 --> 00:07:49,652 at Northrop Grumman in Los Angeles. 182 00:07:49,652 --> 00:07:51,587 Webb's optical segment was integrated 183 00:07:51,587 --> 00:07:52,371 with the spacecraft 184 00:07:52,371 --> 00:07:54,590 and Sunshield segment, and we did more testing. 185 00:07:55,308 --> 00:07:57,243 One thing we can't directly test on Earth 186 00:07:57,243 --> 00:07:59,462 is the effect of zero-G on the system. 187 00:07:59,462 --> 00:08:01,197 We use computer models. 188 00:08:01,197 --> 00:08:03,716 These models give us confidence it would work in the zero 189 00:08:03,716 --> 00:08:05,151 gravity environment, a space 190 00:08:06,719 --> 00:08:09,238 We packed Webb and shipped it out from Los Angeles to the 191 00:08:09,238 --> 00:08:12,391 Panama Canal to the Gardner Space Center in French Guiana. 192 00:08:13,042 --> 00:08:16,128 There, Webb was placed atop the Ariane five rocket 193 00:08:16,128 --> 00:08:19,131 and launched into space on December 25th. 194 00:08:19,999 --> 00:08:24,120 And. The collection deck or large lift off 195 00:08:24,120 --> 00:08:27,290 from a tropical rainforest to the edge of time itself. 196 00:08:27,740 --> 00:08:30,409 James Webb begins a voyage back to the birth 197 00:08:30,409 --> 00:08:32,028 of the universe. 198 00:08:34,580 --> 00:08:37,099 Punching a hole through the clouds. 199 00:08:37,099 --> 00:08:39,869 This is the first time the Webb Observatory was exposed 200 00:08:39,869 --> 00:08:41,337 to the vacuum of space. 201 00:08:41,337 --> 00:08:45,057 The heat of the sun and zero gravity. 202 00:08:45,141 --> 00:08:47,009 Moments after launch, the solar panel 203 00:08:47,009 --> 00:08:48,144 deployed 204 00:08:50,780 --> 00:08:52,248 for the next several weeks. 205 00:08:52,248 --> 00:08:52,698 The Space 206 00:08:52,698 --> 00:08:56,369 Telescope Science Institute team unfolded about 50 parts, 207 00:08:56,369 --> 00:08:59,071 including the sunshield and the mirrors. 208 00:08:59,071 --> 00:09:01,340 The open sunshield helped cool down the instruments, 209 00:09:01,340 --> 00:09:03,626 a mirror to about -400 degrees Fahrenheit. 210 00:09:04,227 --> 00:09:06,229 One of Webb's final deployments was releasing 211 00:09:06,229 --> 00:09:08,447 the Mirror segments from their launch locks. 212 00:09:08,447 --> 00:09:10,533 Then we could start the Mirror alignment process 213 00:09:11,634 --> 00:09:13,402 for the next six weeks, the optics team 214 00:09:13,402 --> 00:09:16,072 worked to perfectly aligned Webb's mirrors. 215 00:09:16,072 --> 00:09:18,140 We had to engineer the telescope and mirrors 216 00:09:18,140 --> 00:09:21,327 to survive all of this and meet demanding optical requirements 217 00:09:28,668 --> 00:09:31,237 So this achievement was not an accident. 218 00:09:31,254 --> 00:09:35,157 It took a lot of hard work and just a total commitment 219 00:09:35,157 --> 00:09:38,628 to excellence by a number of teams over. 220 00:09:38,661 --> 00:09:40,580 For over 20 years, I've been fortunate 221 00:09:40,580 --> 00:09:41,731 enough to work with teams 222 00:09:41,731 --> 00:09:44,717 from Northrop Grumman Ball Aerospace L-3 Harris. 223 00:09:45,117 --> 00:09:47,520 Four different NASA's centers contributed to this, 224 00:09:47,903 --> 00:09:51,173 as well as ESCO Space Telescope and many other companies, 225 00:09:51,507 --> 00:09:54,293 as well as our collaborations with European Space Agency 226 00:09:54,293 --> 00:09:56,629 and the Canadian Space Agency and all the interfaces 227 00:09:56,879 --> 00:09:59,098 and all the aspects of the telescope. 228 00:09:59,098 --> 00:10:02,218 And with all that hard work and dedication, we can now 229 00:10:02,218 --> 00:10:05,371 say it was worth it, that the telescope itself is working. 230 00:10:05,688 --> 00:10:06,806 We still have work to go 231 00:10:06,806 --> 00:10:07,223 to bring on 232 00:10:07,223 --> 00:10:09,775 the rest of the observatory, the rest of the instruments, 233 00:10:10,226 --> 00:10:11,911 finish the alignment of the telescope 234 00:10:11,911 --> 00:10:13,079 to the other instruments 235 00:10:13,079 --> 00:10:15,147 but the optical performance is working, 236 00:10:15,448 --> 00:10:18,751 and we're getting very close to the point that we can turn this 237 00:10:18,751 --> 00:10:21,871 amazing scientific tool over to the astronomical community 238 00:10:22,405 --> 00:10:25,458 and kind of want to leave with the thought that not only have 239 00:10:25,458 --> 00:10:26,659 we built this amazing 240 00:10:26,659 --> 00:10:28,878 scientific capability for this generation, 241 00:10:29,278 --> 00:10:31,397 but we've sort of pioneered a new way to build 242 00:10:31,397 --> 00:10:34,500 large space telescopes which we can give 243 00:10:34,500 --> 00:10:36,502 to the next generation of future generations. 244 00:10:37,586 --> 00:10:39,805 Thank you so much, Lee. 245 00:10:39,805 --> 00:10:42,241 We are now moving on to Aaron Wolfe 246 00:10:42,541 --> 00:10:45,294 who is the Web program manager at Ball Aerospace. 247 00:10:45,328 --> 00:10:47,697 She's going to give us some details about the engineering 248 00:10:47,930 --> 00:10:51,050 that made all of this alignment happen. 249 00:10:51,617 --> 00:10:52,134 We're seeing 250 00:10:52,134 --> 00:10:54,837 the payoff of years of technology development, 251 00:10:55,104 --> 00:10:58,257 the optical hardware that we spent years manufacturing 252 00:10:58,257 --> 00:11:01,377 and polishing and measuring down to the tens of nanometers 253 00:11:01,711 --> 00:11:05,064 is working better than our most optimistic predicts. 254 00:11:05,097 --> 00:11:06,949 It's very exciting. 255 00:11:06,949 --> 00:11:09,418 We also spent a lot of time developing the algorithms 256 00:11:09,418 --> 00:11:10,820 and the mathematical processes 257 00:11:10,820 --> 00:11:13,239 that we would need to perform this alignment in space. 258 00:11:13,406 --> 00:11:15,975 We've never had a segmented telescope in space before, 259 00:11:15,991 --> 00:11:18,511 so we had to invent a whole new process. 260 00:11:18,511 --> 00:11:21,897 So we built a 16 scale model of a testbed telescope 261 00:11:21,897 --> 00:11:23,883 in Colorado to prove out all of those 262 00:11:23,883 --> 00:11:25,885 algorithms and run through the process 263 00:11:26,452 --> 00:11:28,971 that dictates how what our 264 00:11:29,338 --> 00:11:31,557 moves will be on the motors 265 00:11:34,343 --> 00:11:34,794 And it's 266 00:11:34,794 --> 00:11:37,496 actually been easier in space than it was in the lab. 267 00:11:38,297 --> 00:11:40,850 So we used the motors on the back of the mirrors 268 00:11:40,850 --> 00:11:43,285 to make small adjustments to the mirror positions 269 00:11:43,819 --> 00:11:46,889 And we also have that center radius of curvature actuated 270 00:11:46,889 --> 00:11:48,391 that can actually change 271 00:11:48,391 --> 00:11:51,444 the curvature and shape of each individual segment 272 00:11:51,527 --> 00:11:55,097 as we align and tip and tilt and piston through focus 273 00:11:55,381 --> 00:11:56,399 and move them all around. 274 00:11:56,399 --> 00:11:57,116 And the goal here 275 00:11:57,116 --> 00:12:00,453 is to get all 18 segments to work together as one. 276 00:12:00,536 --> 00:12:02,671 One big, monolithic primary mirror 277 00:12:03,322 --> 00:12:06,475 And you can really see the progression of this process 278 00:12:06,475 --> 00:12:08,177 through our pupil images. 279 00:12:08,177 --> 00:12:10,579 So a couple of weeks ago, we took this pupil image 280 00:12:10,946 --> 00:12:12,081 and you can see one segments 281 00:12:12,081 --> 00:12:15,534 really lit up brightly with some starlight coming in. 282 00:12:15,534 --> 00:12:19,789 But now we have a new pupil image with all 18 segments 283 00:12:19,789 --> 00:12:22,858 just lit up and it looks wonderful. 284 00:12:23,459 --> 00:12:24,443 So we're really excited. 285 00:12:24,443 --> 00:12:26,245 So far, the process is working 286 00:12:26,245 --> 00:12:29,432 and the hardware is performing better than requirements. 287 00:12:29,815 --> 00:12:32,001 We couldn't be happier and it's just a testament 288 00:12:32,017 --> 00:12:35,971 like Thomas and Lee have said to all of the years and years 289 00:12:35,971 --> 00:12:40,292 of hard work that everyone has put in, people that haven't. 290 00:12:40,376 --> 00:12:43,529 Not necessarily on the team now for the commissioning, 291 00:12:43,729 --> 00:12:46,499 but they did the technology development decades ago. 292 00:12:46,532 --> 00:12:48,868 The integration for many, many years. 293 00:12:49,168 --> 00:12:52,488 So it's really an honor to bring Webber 294 00:12:52,488 --> 00:12:53,722 through this process 295 00:12:53,722 --> 00:12:55,941 now at the end and work on all of that 296 00:12:55,941 --> 00:12:58,944 amazing technology development that the team did back then. 297 00:13:01,497 --> 00:13:03,415 Thank you to Aaron. 298 00:13:03,415 --> 00:13:06,469 We are now going to move to Marshall Perron with the Space 299 00:13:06,469 --> 00:13:09,588 Telescope Science Institute is going to give us more details 300 00:13:09,588 --> 00:13:11,340 about the alignment 301 00:13:12,241 --> 00:13:12,708 Thanks. 302 00:13:12,708 --> 00:13:16,228 So the alignment process began after the initial deployments 303 00:13:16,228 --> 00:13:16,579 of Webb 304 00:13:16,579 --> 00:13:18,481 back in the first few weeks of this year 305 00:13:18,481 --> 00:13:21,984 and those large unfolding motions that got the mirrors out 306 00:13:21,984 --> 00:13:25,371 to about within a millimeter or so of their desired locations. 307 00:13:25,371 --> 00:13:28,607 But in order to have the mirrors all actors as one, they need 308 00:13:28,607 --> 00:13:31,677 to be lined up to just within a few nanometers of one another. 309 00:13:31,677 --> 00:13:34,480 That ends up being it's a few hundred atomic diameters, 310 00:13:34,513 --> 00:13:36,615 the level of precision that we need here. 311 00:13:36,615 --> 00:13:38,851 So to do that, 312 00:13:38,851 --> 00:13:40,736 we step through a long process. 313 00:13:40,736 --> 00:13:43,489 The team has been preparing and practicing for many, many years 314 00:13:43,823 --> 00:13:47,426 in which we begin by finding the 18 spots of light, 315 00:13:48,260 --> 00:13:50,429 that one from each of the mirrors. 316 00:13:50,429 --> 00:13:52,848 And we gather those together. 317 00:13:52,848 --> 00:13:54,950 We begin by aligning them all 318 00:13:55,284 --> 00:13:57,503 as if they were separate telescopes. 319 00:13:57,503 --> 00:13:59,271 We have 18 telescopes basically at this point. 320 00:13:59,271 --> 00:14:01,757 We're going to focus in align each of those telescopes 321 00:14:01,974 --> 00:14:04,643 one by one, using deep focused images to work out 322 00:14:04,643 --> 00:14:07,012 the misalignments of the mirrors and bring them to the point 323 00:14:07,012 --> 00:14:10,649 that each of these 18 telescopes are sharp on their own. 324 00:14:11,300 --> 00:14:13,619 Once we do that, we begin to stack together. 325 00:14:13,886 --> 00:14:16,138 The spots of light 326 00:14:16,138 --> 00:14:18,474 in this we call image stacking produces 327 00:14:18,474 --> 00:14:20,042 something that has the light gathering power 328 00:14:20,042 --> 00:14:22,044 of the full telescope, but not yet the sharpness. 329 00:14:23,162 --> 00:14:24,713 We still have the mirrors misaligned 330 00:14:24,713 --> 00:14:27,900 by some hundreds of microns at this point in the process. 331 00:14:28,100 --> 00:14:30,085 And we need to refine that alignment 332 00:14:30,085 --> 00:14:32,037 through a series of additional measurement steps and measure. 333 00:14:32,037 --> 00:14:33,505 Correct. Measure, correct. 334 00:14:33,505 --> 00:14:35,507 We use several different measurement techniques. 335 00:14:35,524 --> 00:14:37,977 We move the pattern of spots around the different parts 336 00:14:37,977 --> 00:14:39,295 of the telescope 337 00:14:39,295 --> 00:14:40,713 in order to measure the secondary mirror 338 00:14:40,713 --> 00:14:42,481 alignment between the center in the corners 339 00:14:42,481 --> 00:14:44,099 of the field of view. 340 00:14:44,099 --> 00:14:47,219 We use a prism to split the light 341 00:14:47,219 --> 00:14:50,906 from pairs of segments and measure the piston offsets. 342 00:14:51,123 --> 00:14:52,675 We can then correct those piston offsets 343 00:14:52,675 --> 00:14:54,960 to bring the mirrors in interphase with one another. 344 00:14:55,494 --> 00:14:58,547 And at the end of the process we use a set of the focused 345 00:14:58,847 --> 00:15:01,550 images that we take using lenses we put in the beam. 346 00:15:01,867 --> 00:15:03,719 This is sort of like being at the eye doctor 347 00:15:03,719 --> 00:15:05,537 and you test different lenses and see how 348 00:15:06,572 --> 00:15:09,091 they work And here we're using computer 349 00:15:09,091 --> 00:15:12,111 and mathematical analysis to use those defocus images 350 00:15:12,895 --> 00:15:15,898 to measure the mirror positions with the precision 351 00:15:15,898 --> 00:15:17,583 of just nanometers. 352 00:15:17,583 --> 00:15:21,020 And we use that to dial in these these very fine adjustments 353 00:15:22,554 --> 00:15:24,173 that bring the telescope into it. 354 00:15:24,173 --> 00:15:27,026 Just an exquisite sharpness. 355 00:15:27,026 --> 00:15:28,877 This is a process that we've prepared 356 00:15:28,877 --> 00:15:31,647 and practiced for years 357 00:15:31,647 --> 00:15:32,281 and and 358 00:15:32,281 --> 00:15:34,049 we've rehearsed over the last few years, 359 00:15:34,049 --> 00:15:36,118 and now we've had a chance to run that plan. 360 00:15:36,118 --> 00:15:38,570 And it's just an absolute thrill to be able to say 361 00:15:38,871 --> 00:15:40,022 that everything worked. 362 00:15:40,022 --> 00:15:43,492 And the telescope, at no point in that process 363 00:15:43,492 --> 00:15:44,910 did we have any significant 364 00:15:44,910 --> 00:15:47,363 technical issues with the telescope. 365 00:15:47,363 --> 00:15:49,465 Everything's performing at or above the expectations. 366 00:15:49,465 --> 00:15:50,783 As we said, 367 00:15:50,883 --> 00:15:51,717 there were a couple of places 368 00:15:51,717 --> 00:15:54,236 with some surprises in the data, but little surprises. 369 00:15:54,386 --> 00:15:55,738 The biggest one, honestly, has been 370 00:15:55,738 --> 00:15:59,041 just how closely it matched the models and the predictions 371 00:15:59,491 --> 00:16:00,209 from the ground. 372 00:16:00,209 --> 00:16:02,962 It has been far closer to those predictions than than 373 00:16:02,962 --> 00:16:04,413 a lot of us had dared to hope. 374 00:16:04,413 --> 00:16:06,949 And we now have achieved what's called diffraction 375 00:16:06,949 --> 00:16:08,450 limited alignment of the telescope. 376 00:16:08,450 --> 00:16:10,502 The images are focused together 377 00:16:10,803 --> 00:16:13,522 as finely as the laws of physics allow. 378 00:16:13,739 --> 00:16:14,540 This is a sharpened 379 00:16:14,540 --> 00:16:17,126 image as you can get from a telescope of this size. 380 00:16:18,027 --> 00:16:20,062 And as we were focusing the telescope, 381 00:16:20,062 --> 00:16:22,581 we were using typically one or Bright Star at a time, 382 00:16:22,614 --> 00:16:24,717 a handful of different stars we used on the sky. 383 00:16:24,717 --> 00:16:26,869 But as we were focusing on those bright stars, we couldn't help 384 00:16:26,869 --> 00:16:30,322 but see the rest of the universe coming into focus behind them 385 00:16:30,539 --> 00:16:33,709 to see the more distant stars and galaxies coming into view. 386 00:16:33,959 --> 00:16:36,061 And honestly, the team was giddy at times 387 00:16:36,061 --> 00:16:37,262 just seeing this happen. 388 00:16:37,262 --> 00:16:38,847 There's no way to look at these data 389 00:16:38,847 --> 00:16:41,100 and not be excited at the scientific possibilities 390 00:16:41,300 --> 00:16:43,102 that are opening up here. 391 00:16:43,102 --> 00:16:45,954 We've done this over the last several months. 392 00:16:46,622 --> 00:16:49,008 Within almost exactly on schedule. 393 00:16:49,008 --> 00:16:50,492 There is a few things 394 00:16:50,492 --> 00:16:52,127 that took a little bit longer than we thought. 395 00:16:52,127 --> 00:16:53,846 There are some steps that went faster than we thought. 396 00:16:53,846 --> 00:16:54,863 And so overall, 397 00:16:54,863 --> 00:16:56,215 we're really within just a few days 398 00:16:56,215 --> 00:16:58,217 of exactly where we thought we'd be at this point 399 00:16:58,217 --> 00:16:59,451 about three months after launch. 400 00:16:59,451 --> 00:17:01,620 And that sets us up to be on track 401 00:17:01,770 --> 00:17:03,088 for completing the rest of commissioning 402 00:17:03,088 --> 00:17:04,490 within the six months after launch 403 00:17:04,490 --> 00:17:06,842 and turning over to science starting that summer. 404 00:17:07,443 --> 00:17:08,694 So it's an amazing place to be. 405 00:17:10,679 --> 00:17:11,997 Thank you so much, Marshall. 406 00:17:11,997 --> 00:17:14,033 We have one more speaker to talk a little bit 407 00:17:14,033 --> 00:17:16,101 about that science that Marshall was discussing. 408 00:17:16,101 --> 00:17:18,687 But just a reminder, after that, we will be taking questions 409 00:17:18,921 --> 00:17:20,072 from media on the line. 410 00:17:20,072 --> 00:17:22,674 You can press star one to get into the queue 411 00:17:22,858 --> 00:17:25,944 and for social media, post your questions with the hashtag 412 00:17:26,311 --> 00:17:27,830 unfold the universe. 413 00:17:27,830 --> 00:17:28,764 Thank you so much. 414 00:17:28,764 --> 00:17:32,151 Next, we have Jane Rigby from NASA's Goddard. 415 00:17:32,418 --> 00:17:33,752 Thank you, Karen. 416 00:17:33,752 --> 00:17:36,355 So you've you've heard from the other speakers, 417 00:17:36,355 --> 00:17:37,439 but I'm just going to say it again. 418 00:17:37,439 --> 00:17:39,058 The telescope performance 419 00:17:39,058 --> 00:17:41,660 so far is everything that we dared hope. 420 00:17:42,061 --> 00:17:43,712 The optics work. 421 00:17:43,712 --> 00:17:46,799 The goal here was to build a telescope 100 times 422 00:17:46,799 --> 00:17:49,468 more powerful than anything we've had before 423 00:17:49,952 --> 00:17:53,422 from the early engineering data that we have seen so far. 424 00:17:53,455 --> 00:17:56,091 We know that we're on track to meet 425 00:17:56,091 --> 00:17:58,277 those very demanding science requirements. 426 00:17:58,977 --> 00:18:01,697 The engineering images that we saw today 427 00:18:02,631 --> 00:18:05,400 are as sharp and as crisp 428 00:18:05,400 --> 00:18:07,519 as the images that Hubble can take, 429 00:18:07,519 --> 00:18:10,289 but are at a wavelength of light that is totally invisible 430 00:18:10,289 --> 00:18:11,123 to Hubble. 431 00:18:11,123 --> 00:18:13,308 So this is making the invisible universe 432 00:18:13,559 --> 00:18:16,345 snap into very, very sharp focus. 433 00:18:16,795 --> 00:18:19,014 The requirement was to get to the diffraction 434 00:18:19,014 --> 00:18:20,282 limit at two microns. 435 00:18:20,282 --> 00:18:24,403 We nailed it for the astronomers who are listening to microns, 436 00:18:24,419 --> 00:18:24,770 the point 437 00:18:24,770 --> 00:18:28,657 spread function has a full width at half max of 2.3 pixels. 438 00:18:28,941 --> 00:18:31,009 That's 70 billion arcseconds. 439 00:18:31,009 --> 00:18:33,779 The only way to make those images sharper is to just 440 00:18:34,046 --> 00:18:34,997 make a bigger mirror. 441 00:18:36,331 --> 00:18:37,049 Now, we took this 442 00:18:37,049 --> 00:18:39,301 image to characterize the sharpness, 443 00:18:39,568 --> 00:18:42,838 but you can't help but see those thousands of galaxies 444 00:18:42,838 --> 00:18:43,889 behind it, right? 445 00:18:43,889 --> 00:18:45,958 They're really gorgeous. 446 00:18:45,958 --> 00:18:47,726 Webb can't. 447 00:18:47,726 --> 00:18:50,062 There's no way that Webb can look for 12 seconds 448 00:18:50,062 --> 00:18:53,148 at any point in the sky and not go incredibly deep. 449 00:18:53,782 --> 00:18:56,969 So this is going to be the future from now on, wherever 450 00:18:56,969 --> 00:18:57,503 we look. 451 00:18:57,503 --> 00:18:59,188 It's a deep field 452 00:18:59,271 --> 00:19:02,274 where Webb is seeing back in time to galaxies 453 00:19:02,274 --> 00:19:05,511 that we're seeing that light as it looked billions of years ago 454 00:19:05,761 --> 00:19:08,397 without even really breaking a sweat. 455 00:19:08,397 --> 00:19:11,416 So where we are right now, we have not taken any science 456 00:19:11,416 --> 00:19:12,234 data yet. 457 00:19:12,234 --> 00:19:14,186 We are still commissioning. 458 00:19:14,186 --> 00:19:16,188 And so what does that mean and what's next? 459 00:19:16,188 --> 00:19:18,707 So right now, the telescope is aligned to near 460 00:19:19,224 --> 00:19:20,959 one of the science instruments. 461 00:19:20,959 --> 00:19:23,629 We now have to align the telescope to all four 462 00:19:23,629 --> 00:19:24,780 of the science instruments. 463 00:19:24,780 --> 00:19:25,614 So every one 464 00:19:25,614 --> 00:19:28,500 of those four instruments is getting a crisp image. 465 00:19:29,034 --> 00:19:30,452 And these four science instruments, 466 00:19:30,452 --> 00:19:32,421 we have to get ready for prime time. 467 00:19:32,421 --> 00:19:34,106 We're getting them ready for science. 468 00:19:34,106 --> 00:19:35,507 One of those four science 469 00:19:35,507 --> 00:19:37,826 instruments, Mary, which eventually is going to be 470 00:19:37,826 --> 00:19:39,661 the coldest thing on the observatory. 471 00:19:39,661 --> 00:19:41,997 It's seven degrees above absolute zero. 472 00:19:42,181 --> 00:19:43,282 It's still cooling. 473 00:19:43,282 --> 00:19:46,018 So we're cooling that instrument and we are taking 474 00:19:46,018 --> 00:19:48,387 the science instruments through their checkout period. 475 00:19:48,737 --> 00:19:51,773 And so, you know, this is the process that we 476 00:19:52,291 --> 00:19:55,344 this is the process where we know that, yes, this is 477 00:19:55,344 --> 00:19:57,296 these instruments are working 478 00:19:57,296 --> 00:19:59,631 to do the science that we need them to do. 479 00:19:59,631 --> 00:20:03,468 So the transition to science will happen in July 480 00:20:03,468 --> 00:20:06,355 where we finished commissioning and we move into 481 00:20:06,355 --> 00:20:10,108 a very demanding year of science operations. 482 00:20:10,108 --> 00:20:13,195 We have already selected it's prepared and ready to go. 483 00:20:13,462 --> 00:20:15,981 A year of really compelling, 484 00:20:15,981 --> 00:20:18,300 demanding science with this telescope. 485 00:20:18,800 --> 00:20:21,770 And I'm just so excited to see the science which was 486 00:20:21,770 --> 00:20:23,522 competitively selected. Right. 487 00:20:23,522 --> 00:20:25,908 We received more than a thousand proposals. 488 00:20:26,124 --> 00:20:28,343 We picked the very best ones 489 00:20:28,343 --> 00:20:31,463 so that science is going to be studying galaxies 490 00:20:31,797 --> 00:20:33,799 that where we're seeing the light 491 00:20:33,799 --> 00:20:36,451 as we're seeing these galaxies, they're so far away 492 00:20:36,868 --> 00:20:39,588 that we see them as they looked only a couple hundred 493 00:20:39,588 --> 00:20:43,592 million years after the Big Bang So we're seeing back in time. 494 00:20:43,609 --> 00:20:44,610 This is what we're going to be 495 00:20:44,610 --> 00:20:48,063 doing in Cycle one to understand how 496 00:20:48,830 --> 00:20:50,599 how galaxies like our own 497 00:20:50,599 --> 00:20:53,852 Milky Way formed and then evolved over 498 00:20:53,869 --> 00:20:56,421 13.7 billion years of cosmic time. 499 00:20:57,155 --> 00:21:00,892 Webb will be studying planets that orbit other stars 500 00:21:01,460 --> 00:21:03,679 And more than that, we'll be able to study 501 00:21:03,679 --> 00:21:07,099 the atmospheres of those planets to understand 502 00:21:07,099 --> 00:21:08,200 what they're made of. 503 00:21:08,200 --> 00:21:11,036 You know, a lot of our science is going to be understood 504 00:21:11,603 --> 00:21:14,539 What stuff is made out through a process called spectroscopy? 505 00:21:14,990 --> 00:21:16,675 What are the atmospheres made of? 506 00:21:16,675 --> 00:21:18,660 What are galaxies made of? 507 00:21:18,660 --> 00:21:21,263 Fundamentally, this telescope is going to explore 508 00:21:21,513 --> 00:21:23,732 how we got here and what's out there 509 00:21:24,499 --> 00:21:27,252 and what's out there in our gorgeous universe. 510 00:21:27,269 --> 00:21:29,388 And that's just starting to come into view now. 511 00:21:33,475 --> 00:21:35,360 Thank you so much, Jane. 512 00:21:35,360 --> 00:21:38,096 We are going to move on to the question and answer portion. 513 00:21:38,397 --> 00:21:41,433 We're going to open up the mikes 514 00:21:41,433 --> 00:21:43,769 for the first question, please 515 00:21:51,410 --> 00:21:52,828 If we don't have our first question, 516 00:21:52,828 --> 00:21:55,163 I can pull up a social media question, but let me know 517 00:22:00,686 --> 00:22:01,136 I'm going to go 518 00:22:01,136 --> 00:22:03,171 to social media question while we work that out. 519 00:22:03,989 --> 00:22:06,658 We have a question from Peter on Facebook. 520 00:22:07,042 --> 00:22:07,826 Who is asking, 521 00:22:07,826 --> 00:22:11,480 what about pointing the telescope at different stars? 522 00:22:11,747 --> 00:22:12,831 How is it going to rotate? 523 00:22:12,831 --> 00:22:14,966 Are there actuate or is to facilitate this? 524 00:22:14,966 --> 00:22:17,069 Or does the entire spacecraft move? 525 00:22:18,754 --> 00:22:21,890 You won't take it or say yeah or 526 00:22:21,890 --> 00:22:23,508 so the way Webb moves 527 00:22:23,508 --> 00:22:25,344 that some people think the telescope moves 528 00:22:25,344 --> 00:22:27,179 with respect to the sunshield, but that's not the case. 529 00:22:27,179 --> 00:22:29,931 The telescope and the sunshield all move as a single object. 530 00:22:29,931 --> 00:22:31,500 So the whole observatory 531 00:22:31,500 --> 00:22:33,719 tips and tilts to move across the sky. 532 00:22:33,952 --> 00:22:35,270 The way that happens is there's a thing 533 00:22:35,270 --> 00:22:37,105 called reaction wheels these are, in essence, 534 00:22:37,105 --> 00:22:39,708 big spinning wheels, like a gyroscope within the body 535 00:22:39,708 --> 00:22:40,709 of the observatory, 536 00:22:40,709 --> 00:22:41,760 and they spin one way 537 00:22:41,760 --> 00:22:43,879 to spin the whole telescope the other way, 538 00:22:43,879 --> 00:22:46,348 and that lets the telescope track across the sky. 539 00:22:46,498 --> 00:22:48,083 We then have a fine guidance sensor. 540 00:22:49,051 --> 00:22:51,169 That was the contribution from the Canadian Space Agency 541 00:22:51,169 --> 00:22:53,722 that locks on stars and stabilizes the images, 542 00:22:53,972 --> 00:22:57,809 moving a mirror that adjusts within the third mirror, within 543 00:22:59,094 --> 00:23:01,346 the fourth mirror, within the telescope, 544 00:23:01,346 --> 00:23:03,031 tips and tilts in response to the signals 545 00:23:03,031 --> 00:23:05,333 in the fine guidance sensor to lock onto the different stars 546 00:23:05,634 --> 00:23:08,103 And that's also something we've tested out over the last 547 00:23:08,103 --> 00:23:10,589 few weeks, and it's working very well at this point. 548 00:23:11,273 --> 00:23:12,741 Great. Thank you so much. 549 00:23:12,741 --> 00:23:14,993 We seem to have worked out the problem 550 00:23:14,993 --> 00:23:16,878 with the phone lines, but they should be on now. 551 00:23:16,878 --> 00:23:19,047 So we'll take the first question. 552 00:23:19,347 --> 00:23:20,999 And our first question comes from 553 00:23:20,999 --> 00:23:23,668 Seth Bornstein from the Associated Press. 554 00:23:23,702 --> 00:23:25,737 Your line is now open 555 00:23:26,121 --> 00:23:27,923 Yes. Thank you for doing this. 556 00:23:27,923 --> 00:23:30,075 I guess this is for James 557 00:23:31,126 --> 00:23:32,277 first image. 558 00:23:32,277 --> 00:23:34,946 Can you tell us what star is this? 559 00:23:34,946 --> 00:23:36,748 How far away is this? 560 00:23:36,748 --> 00:23:39,050 Is this as this star been seen 561 00:23:39,050 --> 00:23:41,103 with Hubble or any other telescope? 562 00:23:41,453 --> 00:23:44,606 And what is the difference between the image you're showing 563 00:23:44,606 --> 00:23:47,309 and whatever knowledge we've had in the past 564 00:23:48,727 --> 00:23:50,362 year or so? 565 00:23:50,362 --> 00:23:55,250 Is that that and how much in the past is this star 566 00:23:55,550 --> 00:23:57,986 and how many galaxies are we seeing in the background? 567 00:23:58,286 --> 00:23:58,970 Sure. 568 00:23:58,970 --> 00:24:02,007 So we sort of plucked this star out of obscurity, 569 00:24:02,607 --> 00:24:04,409 minding its own business. 570 00:24:04,409 --> 00:24:05,160 It is point. 571 00:24:05,160 --> 00:24:08,730 It is up looking out of the plane of our solar system. 572 00:24:09,047 --> 00:24:11,032 And we picked it because it was convenient 573 00:24:11,032 --> 00:24:12,467 for the wavefront folks. 574 00:24:12,467 --> 00:24:15,704 It is a nice, boring star of about the right brightness 575 00:24:15,954 --> 00:24:17,606 brightness. And it's off by itself 576 00:24:17,606 --> 00:24:19,374 with no other bright stars nearby. 577 00:24:19,374 --> 00:24:21,927 It's a pretty much generic anonymous star in the sky. 578 00:24:22,227 --> 00:24:22,978 That worked 579 00:24:22,978 --> 00:24:24,362 well for the kind of sensing measurements 580 00:24:24,362 --> 00:24:26,915 we needed to do the brightness of that star. 581 00:24:26,932 --> 00:24:30,469 It's about a hundred times fainter than the visible 582 00:24:30,569 --> 00:24:31,937 than the human eye could see. 583 00:24:31,937 --> 00:24:32,721 And that's the one that looks 584 00:24:32,721 --> 00:24:34,256 so blindingly bright in this image 585 00:24:34,256 --> 00:24:36,391 to get a sense of how sensitive the telescope is. 586 00:24:37,225 --> 00:24:37,909 I don't know. 587 00:24:37,909 --> 00:24:40,312 I can get back to you on how far away that that star is, 588 00:24:40,312 --> 00:24:42,931 but we think it's sort of just a generic 589 00:24:42,931 --> 00:24:45,167 average star in our inner galaxy. 590 00:24:45,567 --> 00:24:47,853 And then the the what was known behind that, 591 00:24:47,853 --> 00:24:49,971 because this isn't a famous deep field. 592 00:24:49,971 --> 00:24:53,241 This is just we've made we've made it a fairly deep field, 593 00:24:53,241 --> 00:24:54,543 but it was just a star. 594 00:24:54,543 --> 00:24:56,995 So the brightest stars in that image are known in 595 00:24:56,995 --> 00:24:58,079 previous study 596 00:24:58,079 --> 00:25:01,283 surveys, the brightest galaxies, everything else there is new 597 00:25:02,350 --> 00:25:03,718 So I'll just add once again, 598 00:25:03,718 --> 00:25:06,087 this star is one of many stars we used throughout 599 00:25:06,087 --> 00:25:08,190 the commissioning process of of Webb. 600 00:25:08,423 --> 00:25:10,458 We've gotten a lot of questions about the stars we're using. 601 00:25:10,825 --> 00:25:12,410 They're generally picked out 602 00:25:12,410 --> 00:25:13,879 not because they're special stars, 603 00:25:13,879 --> 00:25:15,830 but because they're the right brightness 604 00:25:15,830 --> 00:25:18,750 in the right parts of sky for our engineering tests. 605 00:25:19,017 --> 00:25:21,803 They're intentionally, at this point, not special stars. 606 00:25:21,803 --> 00:25:22,137 They're just 607 00:25:22,137 --> 00:25:24,272 here's a generic star we can use to focus the telescope. 608 00:25:25,407 --> 00:25:26,591 Thank you very much. 609 00:25:26,591 --> 00:25:29,477 We will go on to our next question, please. 610 00:25:29,477 --> 00:25:31,796 Our next question is from Chris Jabour. 611 00:25:31,846 --> 00:25:33,448 From NASA's space flight. 612 00:25:33,448 --> 00:25:35,483 Your line is now open. 613 00:25:35,901 --> 00:25:37,402 I can. Yes. 614 00:25:37,402 --> 00:25:38,169 Thank you so much. 615 00:25:38,169 --> 00:25:40,672 I'm wondering, looking out a little bit ahead 616 00:25:41,122 --> 00:25:43,608 to the rest of the Mira alignment, 617 00:25:43,625 --> 00:25:45,627 you mentioned that you have to align it 618 00:25:45,627 --> 00:25:47,062 to each of the instruments. 619 00:25:47,062 --> 00:25:49,014 So I'm wondering 620 00:25:50,899 --> 00:25:53,451 if each time the telescope observes something, 621 00:25:53,451 --> 00:25:56,988 do you have to basically realign it to each of the instruments, 622 00:25:56,988 --> 00:26:01,309 or are you trying to find a one alignment that works for them? 623 00:26:01,409 --> 00:26:04,479 All. And in particular, 624 00:26:04,479 --> 00:26:07,132 like how would that work going forward with practical 625 00:26:07,132 --> 00:26:09,834 observations in terms of seeing all the way back 626 00:26:10,352 --> 00:26:13,255 and seeing very, very close objects in our own solar system? 627 00:26:14,155 --> 00:26:15,574 Thank you. Question. 628 00:26:15,574 --> 00:26:16,408 Yeah, I can answer that. 629 00:26:16,408 --> 00:26:17,909 That's a good question. 630 00:26:18,293 --> 00:26:20,428 You know, we we initially lines to near Cam 631 00:26:21,029 --> 00:26:23,181 as an instrument because it has that's 632 00:26:23,481 --> 00:26:26,151 some of those special optics in their filter wheel 633 00:26:26,151 --> 00:26:28,853 that Marshall mentioned just for our alignment process. 634 00:26:28,970 --> 00:26:29,971 Now that we've gone through 635 00:26:29,971 --> 00:26:32,274 that fine alignment process with your cam, 636 00:26:32,641 --> 00:26:35,910 we will take a look at the other instruments 637 00:26:35,910 --> 00:26:39,497 across the field of view and we'll balance the alignment 638 00:26:39,497 --> 00:26:43,768 of the entire telescope up to all four of the instruments 639 00:26:45,120 --> 00:26:45,587 so that they're 640 00:26:45,587 --> 00:26:47,939 all in focus and they're all nice and sharp. 641 00:26:48,657 --> 00:26:50,809 But once we're done with that process, 642 00:26:51,059 --> 00:26:53,428 then we leave it alone basically. 643 00:26:53,428 --> 00:26:56,548 And we only do maintenance operations is what we call them. 644 00:26:56,698 --> 00:26:58,617 So every couple of days we'll take a measurement 645 00:26:58,617 --> 00:27:01,519 and see how the alignment looks see how the wavefront looks, 646 00:27:01,770 --> 00:27:05,156 and if it's drifted a little bit, maybe for thermal drifts 647 00:27:05,156 --> 00:27:06,207 or other reasons, 648 00:27:06,207 --> 00:27:09,327 then we can make a tiny correction we'll still be making 649 00:27:09,327 --> 00:27:12,147 on the nanometer size moves at that point. 650 00:27:12,147 --> 00:27:14,783 So we won't be realigning the telescope. 651 00:27:15,383 --> 00:27:18,053 We'll just keep it in focus and maintain it 652 00:27:18,153 --> 00:27:20,005 throughout mission life. 653 00:27:21,473 --> 00:27:22,107 Thanks. 654 00:27:22,107 --> 00:27:25,043 We are ready for our next question. 655 00:27:25,143 --> 00:27:25,493 Thank you. 656 00:27:25,493 --> 00:27:29,331 Our next question comes from Alisha Belzer from Mashable. 657 00:27:29,364 --> 00:27:30,332 Your line is now open. 658 00:27:31,916 --> 00:27:34,469 Hi. Thank you for doing this and congrats. 659 00:27:35,337 --> 00:27:37,889 I was hoping just for the general public, 660 00:27:37,889 --> 00:27:41,359 could you explain the features of the image? 661 00:27:42,027 --> 00:27:45,780 In other words, what's causing those big, bright lights, 662 00:27:45,830 --> 00:27:49,100 structures and what's giving the image its red color? 663 00:27:49,517 --> 00:27:50,251 Thanks. 664 00:27:50,452 --> 00:27:50,985 Yeah. 665 00:27:51,119 --> 00:27:52,921 So I can help you a little bit. 666 00:27:52,921 --> 00:27:54,422 So first of all, 667 00:27:54,673 --> 00:27:57,509 the the color that's actually the colors that we used. 668 00:27:57,709 --> 00:28:00,211 The engineers use to to display it. 669 00:28:00,211 --> 00:28:02,030 But the actual light that's coming in 670 00:28:02,030 --> 00:28:02,897 is infrared light, 671 00:28:02,897 --> 00:28:05,266 which you would not normally be able to see with your eye. 672 00:28:05,600 --> 00:28:07,769 So we wound up using red 673 00:28:08,336 --> 00:28:10,622 to help us see the contrast in the image. 674 00:28:10,822 --> 00:28:13,074 And that's what we're displaying here. 675 00:28:13,074 --> 00:28:15,677 But in terms of what you're that the spikes that you see 676 00:28:15,677 --> 00:28:17,479 coming out of the star, 677 00:28:17,479 --> 00:28:20,281 any telescope that has special structures 678 00:28:20,281 --> 00:28:22,200 like this, the shape of our mirrors 679 00:28:22,200 --> 00:28:24,469 will have that kind of spikes in it. 680 00:28:24,803 --> 00:28:25,403 Those are actually 681 00:28:25,403 --> 00:28:28,323 the result of, in this case, having hexagonal segments 682 00:28:28,673 --> 00:28:30,442 So we have these six sided mirrors 683 00:28:30,442 --> 00:28:33,328 and we also have our struts are the things that hold 684 00:28:33,328 --> 00:28:34,612 the secondary mirror up. 685 00:28:34,612 --> 00:28:38,516 And because of the sort of the way that light travels 686 00:28:38,516 --> 00:28:41,102 and that actually causes something called diffraction 687 00:28:41,336 --> 00:28:42,387 that makes those spikes. 688 00:28:42,387 --> 00:28:44,372 And you see that most intensely 689 00:28:44,372 --> 00:28:45,890 when you have a very bright star 690 00:28:45,890 --> 00:28:47,192 and the other stars in the field, 691 00:28:47,192 --> 00:28:49,427 you don't see it as much because they're dimmer. 692 00:28:49,427 --> 00:28:52,046 And those effects are much harder to see. 693 00:28:52,046 --> 00:28:54,032 And that's why you only see it in that very bright star. 694 00:28:55,950 --> 00:28:58,286 Thank you so much, Marshall. 695 00:28:58,286 --> 00:29:00,805 We are going to continue with some more media questions. 696 00:29:00,805 --> 00:29:04,058 Next ones up All right. 697 00:29:04,075 --> 00:29:07,262 And our next question is from Bill Harwood from CBS News. 698 00:29:07,278 --> 00:29:09,197 Your line is open. 699 00:29:09,380 --> 00:29:11,132 Hey, thank you very much. 700 00:29:11,132 --> 00:29:13,051 Yeah, I just want to follow up on an earlier question 701 00:29:13,051 --> 00:29:15,170 because I'm still a little bit confused about 702 00:29:16,521 --> 00:29:19,140 the alignment to date and then what has to be done 703 00:29:19,140 --> 00:29:20,425 for the other instruments. 704 00:29:20,425 --> 00:29:23,061 So I'm taking it that you're perfectly aligned 705 00:29:23,311 --> 00:29:25,764 there have been the focus is a sharp, 706 00:29:27,031 --> 00:29:29,117 sharp as you can get it. 707 00:29:29,634 --> 00:29:31,286 But are you moving? 708 00:29:31,286 --> 00:29:31,970 I don't understand. 709 00:29:31,970 --> 00:29:32,971 If it's the secondary 710 00:29:32,971 --> 00:29:36,357 that you remove at this point or individual segments to it 711 00:29:36,508 --> 00:29:38,543 to achieve that focus for everybody. 712 00:29:39,527 --> 00:29:41,996 I guess I'm just not visualizing how that works 713 00:29:42,380 --> 00:29:46,501 or how the internal mirrors and will play into all of that. 714 00:29:47,569 --> 00:29:48,236 Thanks. 715 00:29:48,319 --> 00:29:48,887 So the 716 00:29:48,887 --> 00:29:51,890 primary things we're doing that are still in front of us. 717 00:29:52,257 --> 00:29:55,193 The secondary mirror right now is actually fairly well aligned. 718 00:29:55,860 --> 00:29:59,514 And we know not we know that not just because of the star 719 00:29:59,514 --> 00:30:00,348 that we just showed you, 720 00:30:00,348 --> 00:30:02,417 but the other stars in that field 721 00:30:02,700 --> 00:30:04,319 tell us it's pretty well aligned. 722 00:30:04,319 --> 00:30:06,237 But we want to we want to make it 723 00:30:06,237 --> 00:30:07,405 as good as possible 724 00:30:07,405 --> 00:30:09,174 so that it's balance for all four instruments. 725 00:30:09,174 --> 00:30:11,659 So we do we do have to do a little bit of 726 00:30:12,744 --> 00:30:15,063 very small tweaks to the secondary mirror alignment 727 00:30:15,363 --> 00:30:17,065 and then also the instruments themselves. 728 00:30:17,065 --> 00:30:17,966 Several of the instruments 729 00:30:17,966 --> 00:30:20,602 have the ability to focus internally to the instrument, 730 00:30:20,852 --> 00:30:21,452 and that's something 731 00:30:21,452 --> 00:30:23,521 we still need to do is to get them focused 732 00:30:23,721 --> 00:30:25,523 once the telescope itself 733 00:30:25,523 --> 00:30:27,592 is fully aligned and fully focused in a way 734 00:30:27,592 --> 00:30:29,460 that balances off our instruments. 735 00:30:29,460 --> 00:30:31,646 It's a very minor change that's in front of us. 736 00:30:31,646 --> 00:30:34,349 But when you're trying to do sort of transformative science, 737 00:30:34,349 --> 00:30:37,218 you have to really get to the ultimate performance. 738 00:30:37,218 --> 00:30:40,471 And it'll be a few weeks to do this, but we will be able 739 00:30:40,471 --> 00:30:43,258 to leave the telescope from that time forward. 740 00:30:46,010 --> 00:30:47,762 Thank you so much. 741 00:30:49,163 --> 00:30:50,398 And we will move on to our next 742 00:30:50,398 --> 00:30:52,951 question, please, from the media. 743 00:30:52,951 --> 00:30:56,671 Our next question comes from Eileen Woodward from WSJ. 744 00:30:56,688 --> 00:30:58,857 Your line is now open. 745 00:30:59,357 --> 00:31:00,859 Hi. Thank you so much for this. 746 00:31:00,859 --> 00:31:03,511 I just wanted to ask, 747 00:31:03,511 --> 00:31:06,231 do you think that you have sort of passed the performance 748 00:31:06,231 --> 00:31:09,751 Rubicon in terms of between now and June 749 00:31:09,751 --> 00:31:12,503 and July, when you expect to start scientific observations 750 00:31:12,503 --> 00:31:15,840 and see first imagery of that deep universe? 751 00:31:16,307 --> 00:31:18,943 Do you anticipate any problems between then and now? 752 00:31:19,160 --> 00:31:21,746 It seems to me like coarse and fine phrasing were sort of 753 00:31:22,530 --> 00:31:26,084 the big thing that we wanted to achieve, and you've done so. 754 00:31:26,167 --> 00:31:29,220 I'm curious if you anticipate any issues between now and then. 755 00:31:29,971 --> 00:31:32,574 We'll start out with Thomas for that question. 756 00:31:32,574 --> 00:31:35,043 So I'm really interested in other answers Actually, 757 00:31:35,276 --> 00:31:38,997 I just want to tell you, of all the sleepless nights 758 00:31:38,997 --> 00:31:41,132 I've had and kind of the worries I've had 759 00:31:41,249 --> 00:31:42,984 that are all behind us now, 760 00:31:42,984 --> 00:31:45,453 and it's not because there is no path ahead. 761 00:31:45,453 --> 00:31:47,005 There's still a mountain to climb. 762 00:31:47,005 --> 00:31:49,607 There are important tasks that need to be done 763 00:31:49,791 --> 00:31:51,593 and important things that need to be proven, 764 00:31:51,593 --> 00:31:54,979 such as the alignment, as I was also all the modalities in each 765 00:31:54,979 --> 00:31:58,549 one of the instruments needs to be tested and calibrated. 766 00:31:58,850 --> 00:32:01,252 So there's important stuff ahead. 767 00:32:01,252 --> 00:32:05,573 But I want to tell you, you you know, kind of what's behind us. 768 00:32:05,757 --> 00:32:07,592 We're way up that mountain now. 769 00:32:07,592 --> 00:32:08,860 We're way up that mountain. 770 00:32:08,860 --> 00:32:10,111 Yes. There's a path that 771 00:32:10,111 --> 00:32:13,047 and you know, in our world, there's always a path ahead. 772 00:32:13,197 --> 00:32:15,500 We never go say we're done. 773 00:32:15,500 --> 00:32:16,818 We can take it easy now. 774 00:32:16,818 --> 00:32:19,337 So so kind of the way we create success is by, 775 00:32:19,337 --> 00:32:22,256 frankly, focusing on the issues that are still ahead. 776 00:32:22,256 --> 00:32:23,491 And we're worrying about 777 00:32:23,491 --> 00:32:25,576 But I'm interested in other opinions or other 778 00:32:25,576 --> 00:32:26,427 statements to that. 779 00:32:28,012 --> 00:32:30,231 Well, I I do want to say one thing is, 780 00:32:30,231 --> 00:32:33,468 you know, we do know now that we built the right telescope 781 00:32:33,468 --> 00:32:35,820 in terms of the optics, that is not going to change. 782 00:32:36,587 --> 00:32:37,922 And that's something that the fine 783 00:32:37,922 --> 00:32:39,207 phasing process is brought out. 784 00:32:39,207 --> 00:32:41,459 We've been able to analyze those images 785 00:32:41,459 --> 00:32:43,378 and we know we built the right telescope. 786 00:32:43,378 --> 00:32:45,747 And, of course, you know, that's a big deal. 787 00:32:45,780 --> 00:32:48,566 And so so that's partially why we're here today. 788 00:32:49,167 --> 00:32:51,686 But but as Thomas said and others have said, 789 00:32:51,686 --> 00:32:52,854 you know, there is work to go. 790 00:32:52,854 --> 00:32:55,406 So we're not there on the entire observatory. 791 00:32:55,940 --> 00:32:58,459 But just to take that image, you know, that was a 2100 792 00:32:58,509 --> 00:33:00,411 second image. A lot of things had to work. 793 00:33:00,411 --> 00:33:01,379 We had to be able to point, 794 00:33:01,379 --> 00:33:02,363 we had to be able to, 795 00:33:02,363 --> 00:33:05,133 you know, guide, which means kind of track on that star. 796 00:33:05,133 --> 00:33:06,117 Precisely. 797 00:33:06,117 --> 00:33:09,237 It was a fairly long period of time that we took that image. 798 00:33:09,237 --> 00:33:11,239 So there's a lot of things that are working really well, 799 00:33:11,572 --> 00:33:12,774 but there is more work to go. 800 00:33:14,392 --> 00:33:14,842 All right. 801 00:33:14,842 --> 00:33:15,777 Thank you. 802 00:33:15,777 --> 00:33:19,197 We will go to the next question from the phone lines. 803 00:33:19,197 --> 00:33:20,331 And our next question comes 804 00:33:20,331 --> 00:33:23,217 from Alexandria with from Nature magazine. 805 00:33:23,251 --> 00:33:25,286 Your line is now open. 806 00:33:25,470 --> 00:33:26,304 Great. Thank you. 807 00:33:26,304 --> 00:33:28,489 My question is for Jane Rigby. 808 00:33:28,489 --> 00:33:29,424 Can you just 809 00:33:29,424 --> 00:33:32,477 pass forward a little bit more to sort of first science again? 810 00:33:33,111 --> 00:33:35,313 We hear dates of June, July. 811 00:33:35,313 --> 00:33:35,630 Can you 812 00:33:35,630 --> 00:33:38,332 be a little bit more precise on when we'll have more timing 813 00:33:38,332 --> 00:33:41,786 on which of those dates, which of those months is accurate? 814 00:33:41,786 --> 00:33:45,056 And also, what do we know about kind of the super secret 815 00:33:45,056 --> 00:33:47,658 first science observations that are going to be made? 816 00:33:47,658 --> 00:33:49,494 Have those targets been chosen? 817 00:33:49,494 --> 00:33:50,128 I know you can't 818 00:33:50,128 --> 00:33:52,380 tell us what they are, but have those targets been chosen? 819 00:33:52,680 --> 00:33:54,032 Okay. In reverse order? 820 00:33:54,032 --> 00:33:56,818 Yes. The targets have been chosen for the super secret 821 00:33:57,151 --> 00:33:58,970 first images that will be released. 822 00:33:59,937 --> 00:34:02,323 The science targets, of course, have all been chosen. 823 00:34:02,340 --> 00:34:05,126 We've selected more than a full year of science, 824 00:34:05,393 --> 00:34:07,795 and those operate those targets have been chosen 825 00:34:07,795 --> 00:34:10,248 and those programs have been fully specified. 826 00:34:10,431 --> 00:34:13,501 The computer files that tell the little Web 827 00:34:13,501 --> 00:34:16,137 how to take the data, we have all those in hat in hand 828 00:34:16,521 --> 00:34:18,322 As far as the specifics, we are going. 829 00:34:18,322 --> 00:34:20,091 We will start science operations 830 00:34:20,091 --> 00:34:21,709 when we are done with commissioning. 831 00:34:21,709 --> 00:34:24,078 Commissioning is nominally six months long. 832 00:34:24,262 --> 00:34:28,132 We launched on Christmas Day So that would be the end of June 833 00:34:31,619 --> 00:34:31,886 Great. 834 00:34:31,886 --> 00:34:32,970 Thank you. 835 00:34:33,654 --> 00:34:36,741 Moving on to the next question, please. 836 00:34:36,741 --> 00:34:36,991 Right. 837 00:34:36,991 --> 00:34:40,378 And our next question comes from Passant Bobby from Inverse. 838 00:34:40,411 --> 00:34:42,447 Your line is now open. 839 00:34:43,097 --> 00:34:44,849 Thank you. Yes. 840 00:34:44,849 --> 00:34:46,584 I'm wondering, you know, 841 00:34:46,584 --> 00:34:49,771 how have was seen all of these stunning images, images 842 00:34:49,771 --> 00:34:54,025 but with James Webb just looking at more distant objects? 843 00:34:54,509 --> 00:34:57,261 Is there a esthetic value or sort of visual value? 844 00:34:57,562 --> 00:35:01,099 Less important is more about the data with these images 845 00:35:03,868 --> 00:35:04,218 both. 846 00:35:04,218 --> 00:35:08,222 And like I mean, they're gorgeous. 847 00:35:08,823 --> 00:35:12,110 Like, you can't help but enjoy the seeing that this 848 00:35:12,326 --> 00:35:12,977 is part of why 849 00:35:12,977 --> 00:35:15,897 we're all astronomers is to study the stars, 850 00:35:15,897 --> 00:35:18,049 because many of us up here on stage, 851 00:35:18,049 --> 00:35:20,001 you know, looked at the sky as kids or looked at pictures 852 00:35:20,001 --> 00:35:22,436 from Hubble or other telescopes and said, that's amazing. 853 00:35:23,371 --> 00:35:26,057 But in addition, we want to make the technical 854 00:35:26,057 --> 00:35:27,141 scientific measurements 855 00:35:27,141 --> 00:35:30,144 and some of the measurements we make with Web will be, 856 00:35:30,862 --> 00:35:31,129 you know, 857 00:35:31,129 --> 00:35:33,831 not as visually stunning that will be series of lines. 858 00:35:34,098 --> 00:35:36,501 There will be this the spectra, 859 00:35:36,501 --> 00:35:38,486 some of the measurements with Webb will be, I think, 860 00:35:38,486 --> 00:35:41,072 even more stunning multicolor imagery. 861 00:35:41,072 --> 00:35:42,473 We're going to have there's two instruments in Webb 862 00:35:42,473 --> 00:35:44,192 that have what's called the Integral Field Spectrograph 863 00:35:44,192 --> 00:35:45,259 that gives you an image, 864 00:35:45,259 --> 00:35:48,179 but not in three colors, but in thousands of colors at once. 865 00:35:48,179 --> 00:35:50,214 And those are going to be some some really neat data to see. 866 00:35:50,581 --> 00:35:51,933 And that's part of the complexity 867 00:35:51,933 --> 00:35:53,000 with calibrating the instruments. 868 00:35:53,000 --> 00:35:54,001 So I think 869 00:35:54,001 --> 00:35:56,337 just like with Hubble, there are some Hubble images 870 00:35:56,654 --> 00:35:59,490 that we take that do have deep esthetic value 871 00:35:59,724 --> 00:36:02,310 and they have scientific value and it's always a both. 872 00:36:02,310 --> 00:36:06,080 And yeah, and some of what we're getting from the spectroscopy, 873 00:36:06,297 --> 00:36:09,033 you know, we'll be telling you how galaxies are rotating 874 00:36:09,317 --> 00:36:11,969 and how the gas in those galaxies is getting blown 875 00:36:11,969 --> 00:36:15,323 out of them by supernova and will be determining what 876 00:36:15,373 --> 00:36:18,709 the composition of what the gas in galaxies is 877 00:36:18,960 --> 00:36:20,995 and the composition of the atmospheres of planets 878 00:36:20,995 --> 00:36:23,965 so that you know, maybe it's a little bit geekier, 879 00:36:23,965 --> 00:36:26,334 but what you get out of it is really, really cool. 880 00:36:26,551 --> 00:36:29,487 So we will both be doing stuff that makes us giddy and happy 881 00:36:29,487 --> 00:36:29,837 and always 882 00:36:29,837 --> 00:36:32,757 gorgeous and stuff where we say, Oh my God, now we know what. 883 00:36:32,940 --> 00:36:35,209 Now we know what that's made of that we never did before. 884 00:36:37,144 --> 00:36:38,763 It's a great, great answer. 885 00:36:38,763 --> 00:36:39,947 I'm looking for a lot of giddy 886 00:36:39,947 --> 00:36:42,149 and happy as we as we go forward. 887 00:36:43,050 --> 00:36:43,367 All right. 888 00:36:43,367 --> 00:36:45,853 We'll take the next question, please. 889 00:36:45,853 --> 00:36:48,806 Next question comes from George Divorce from Gizmodo. 890 00:36:48,839 --> 00:36:50,875 Your line is now open. 891 00:36:51,842 --> 00:36:53,578 Hey, guys, thank you very much for doing this. 892 00:36:53,578 --> 00:36:57,632 I just want to go back again to any potential issues 893 00:36:57,632 --> 00:37:00,151 that may still be encountered 894 00:37:00,201 --> 00:37:02,687 as the commissioning phase continues. 895 00:37:02,687 --> 00:37:03,271 And I'm just hoping 896 00:37:03,271 --> 00:37:06,057 that you guys could be a bit more specific 897 00:37:06,057 --> 00:37:08,359 in particular when it comes to the instrumentation, 898 00:37:09,543 --> 00:37:11,312 the upcoming steps, are there any, you know, 899 00:37:11,312 --> 00:37:13,648 potential points of failure that could really disrupt 900 00:37:14,282 --> 00:37:16,200 the unveiling of the telescope 901 00:37:16,200 --> 00:37:17,335 and I know that 902 00:37:17,418 --> 00:37:18,686 Tom has already said that nothing's going 903 00:37:18,686 --> 00:37:19,620 to keep him up at night anymore. 904 00:37:19,620 --> 00:37:21,839 But I'm wondering, the rest of the team agrees with that. 905 00:37:21,839 --> 00:37:22,940 Are there any steps 906 00:37:22,940 --> 00:37:25,910 or that are really still kind of harrowing or problematic 907 00:37:25,910 --> 00:37:28,613 that could really disrupt the process? 908 00:37:28,713 --> 00:37:29,163 Thanks, guys. 909 00:37:31,232 --> 00:37:32,300 I could take that. 910 00:37:32,333 --> 00:37:34,919 So, you know, we've had days on this project 911 00:37:34,919 --> 00:37:37,638 where if it didn't work, we were going to go home, right? 912 00:37:37,638 --> 00:37:39,390 If the sunshield hadn't come out, 913 00:37:39,390 --> 00:37:41,242 well, then we don't have a mission. 914 00:37:41,242 --> 00:37:43,527 If the secondary mirror hadn't deployed, 915 00:37:43,761 --> 00:37:45,596 we call it secondary now because it's not important, 916 00:37:45,596 --> 00:37:47,665 but because it's the second after the primary, 917 00:37:47,665 --> 00:37:49,367 if the secondary hadn't come out, 918 00:37:49,367 --> 00:37:51,619 all that beautiful light coming into the primary 919 00:37:51,636 --> 00:37:53,721 was just going to bounce off into space forever. 920 00:37:54,839 --> 00:37:56,057 And we wouldn't detect it. 921 00:37:56,057 --> 00:37:56,841 So there were parts 922 00:37:56,841 --> 00:37:58,009 on this mission where it's like, well, 923 00:37:58,009 --> 00:38:00,361 this is going to work or we're done. 924 00:38:00,361 --> 00:38:01,529 We're past those points. 925 00:38:01,529 --> 00:38:02,997 Now, that's what Thomas was getting at. 926 00:38:02,997 --> 00:38:05,666 And we're now to the stage where if things don't work, 927 00:38:05,666 --> 00:38:07,401 we're looking at degrade. 928 00:38:07,401 --> 00:38:07,618 You know, 929 00:38:07,618 --> 00:38:08,069 we're looking at 930 00:38:08,069 --> 00:38:10,671 partial degradation of the total science return. 931 00:38:11,038 --> 00:38:12,690 We have four science instruments. 932 00:38:12,690 --> 00:38:14,992 All four of them have turned on and said, 933 00:38:15,326 --> 00:38:18,446 hi, our aliveness check says we're okay for some of those. 934 00:38:18,446 --> 00:38:20,331 For three of those instruments, we have data. 935 00:38:20,331 --> 00:38:22,450 They're coming back. Yes. This is looking okay. 936 00:38:22,466 --> 00:38:23,601 It's early days. 937 00:38:23,601 --> 00:38:24,919 Mary has to cool 938 00:38:24,919 --> 00:38:27,855 from it's in the temperatures in the nineties right now. 939 00:38:27,872 --> 00:38:29,340 90 Kelvin. 940 00:38:29,340 --> 00:38:30,241 90 something Kelvin. 941 00:38:30,241 --> 00:38:32,159 It needs to get down to seven Kelvin. 942 00:38:32,159 --> 00:38:34,011 So that's something that I'm looking at right. 943 00:38:34,011 --> 00:38:37,248 This this has this closed circuit refrigerator 944 00:38:37,531 --> 00:38:40,318 that circulates helium to chill Murray 945 00:38:40,318 --> 00:38:42,887 much colder than the rest of the of the science instruments. 946 00:38:43,187 --> 00:38:44,872 So that's something we're okay. 947 00:38:44,872 --> 00:38:45,656 That's a big deal. 948 00:38:45,656 --> 00:38:49,276 We want to get very cold, but we're now looking at where 949 00:38:49,276 --> 00:38:49,877 I mean, yes, 950 00:38:49,877 --> 00:38:53,514 space is a dangerous environment and Webb is up there in space 951 00:38:53,514 --> 00:38:55,349 and every day we have to keep it safe 952 00:38:55,349 --> 00:38:57,501 and there's work to do to do that. 953 00:38:57,501 --> 00:38:59,937 But most of what we're looking at going forward is 954 00:38:59,937 --> 00:39:02,957 if things don't work, we're looking at gradual degradation 955 00:39:02,957 --> 00:39:05,810 of the total return rather than shows over folks. 956 00:39:06,277 --> 00:39:09,230 And the key thing about the telescope is the telescope 957 00:39:09,230 --> 00:39:10,614 feeds all four instruments. 958 00:39:10,614 --> 00:39:12,483 So when the telescope doesn't work, 959 00:39:12,483 --> 00:39:14,668 then that really affects the entire mission. 960 00:39:14,668 --> 00:39:16,103 And we're now beyond that point. 961 00:39:16,103 --> 00:39:19,707 Now, there's always the potential that some subsystem 962 00:39:19,740 --> 00:39:21,992 might not work at some point. 963 00:39:22,309 --> 00:39:23,027 That happens 964 00:39:23,027 --> 00:39:25,162 but we have a lot of redundancy in all 965 00:39:25,162 --> 00:39:26,664 of our electrical systems. 966 00:39:26,664 --> 00:39:29,417 So from the point of view of having a working observatory, 967 00:39:29,717 --> 00:39:32,636 as Jane said, you know, we're in very good shape 968 00:39:32,636 --> 00:39:34,472 and so now we're really going to be focusing 969 00:39:34,472 --> 00:39:36,891 more on individual instruments and bringing them online 970 00:39:39,560 --> 00:39:41,429 Thank you so much. 971 00:39:41,579 --> 00:39:43,697 We will take the next question from the phone lines, please. 972 00:39:44,815 --> 00:39:48,119 Our next question comes from Marina Warren from Atlantic. 973 00:39:48,152 --> 00:39:50,071 Your line is now open. 974 00:39:50,838 --> 00:39:52,289 Hi, everyone. 975 00:39:52,440 --> 00:39:54,809 Can you tell us more about the group that chose 976 00:39:54,809 --> 00:39:57,678 the top secret targets for the first big image release? 977 00:39:58,345 --> 00:39:58,763 How big 978 00:39:58,763 --> 00:40:01,882 is the group who was involved and from which institutions, 979 00:40:02,216 --> 00:40:04,802 and what exactly was the list of targets finalized? 980 00:40:05,302 --> 00:40:07,438 You get back to them. 981 00:40:07,438 --> 00:40:10,458 What I am hearing in the room is that we will get back to you 982 00:40:10,458 --> 00:40:11,125 on that Marina. 983 00:40:11,125 --> 00:40:11,609 I don't know that 984 00:40:11,609 --> 00:40:15,563 we have the exact size and people at our fingertips, 985 00:40:15,563 --> 00:40:17,748 but I will follow up with you when this is over. 986 00:40:17,748 --> 00:40:20,000 You can drop me an email and I will get you what I can on that. 987 00:40:21,152 --> 00:40:22,286 Do you like the second 988 00:40:22,286 --> 00:40:25,706 question, given that we couldn't answer your first? 989 00:40:25,706 --> 00:40:26,490 I do. 990 00:40:26,490 --> 00:40:28,225 Thank you for it. 991 00:40:29,460 --> 00:40:30,628 Can you tell us so we've 992 00:40:30,628 --> 00:40:33,647 heard a bit about the start at the center of this image. 993 00:40:34,048 --> 00:40:35,966 Can you tell us more about the galaxies 994 00:40:35,966 --> 00:40:38,068 that are in the background you know, what, how, 995 00:40:38,552 --> 00:40:41,572 how far they are and how does this compare to how 996 00:40:42,022 --> 00:40:45,893 well we'll see galaxies in the future in a closer. 997 00:40:46,110 --> 00:40:47,812 Well, again, it's all right. 998 00:40:47,812 --> 00:40:49,830 Well, I guess I'm the galaxy geek in this crowd. 999 00:40:50,448 --> 00:40:50,915 Okay. 1000 00:40:50,915 --> 00:40:53,717 So as we said, this wasn't a famous deep field. 1001 00:40:53,717 --> 00:40:54,752 This isn't a place where 1002 00:40:54,752 --> 00:40:57,872 we studied, where we've known what's out there. 1003 00:40:58,772 --> 00:40:59,907 Just eyeballing it. 1004 00:40:59,907 --> 00:41:01,592 I mean, we got those data. 1005 00:41:01,592 --> 00:41:02,943 They came down Saturday night. 1006 00:41:02,943 --> 00:41:06,797 So I was eyeballing them Sunday morning in my pajamas and 1007 00:41:07,498 --> 00:41:09,583 and, yeah, they're like, you know, 1008 00:41:09,583 --> 00:41:12,153 they're several billion light years away, 1009 00:41:12,153 --> 00:41:14,121 but we actually have to take some spectroscopy 1010 00:41:14,121 --> 00:41:16,457 to get you a better answer than that. 1011 00:41:16,457 --> 00:41:19,076 We can do spectroscopy once we get the science 1012 00:41:19,076 --> 00:41:20,427 instruments ready to go. 1013 00:41:20,427 --> 00:41:22,796 And so that's the sort of thing that Webb will be able to do 1014 00:41:22,830 --> 00:41:25,082 once we get into normal science operations 1015 00:41:25,399 --> 00:41:26,901 of the Near Speck instrument. 1016 00:41:26,901 --> 00:41:29,487 Which was made by the European Space Agency, 1017 00:41:29,753 --> 00:41:31,405 has this really cool micro shutter 1018 00:41:31,405 --> 00:41:32,573 array where it has a quarter 1019 00:41:32,573 --> 00:41:34,825 of a million little doors that can open and close. 1020 00:41:35,159 --> 00:41:38,312 And so we can take spectra of dozens of targets 1021 00:41:38,312 --> 00:41:39,647 within that field. 1022 00:41:39,647 --> 00:41:43,200 And so one of the key science capabilities that this telescope 1023 00:41:43,200 --> 00:41:45,920 has is to target a field like that and pick 1024 00:41:45,920 --> 00:41:49,673 the most interesting 30, 40 galaxies and say, 1025 00:41:49,673 --> 00:41:51,141 I want a spectrum of that that that that 1026 00:41:51,141 --> 00:41:53,727 that that that's at that that and with that, you know 1027 00:41:53,727 --> 00:41:56,931 exactly how far away each of those galaxies are. 1028 00:41:56,931 --> 00:41:58,465 And depending how you do it, 1029 00:41:58,465 --> 00:42:00,901 you understand how much heavy elements 1030 00:42:01,435 --> 00:42:04,855 carbon, oxygen, nitrogen those galaxies have relative 1031 00:42:04,855 --> 00:42:05,990 to hydrogen. 1032 00:42:05,990 --> 00:42:09,777 So that tells you how many times the gas in those galaxies 1033 00:42:09,777 --> 00:42:12,663 has gone through stars and then exploded in supernovae. 1034 00:42:14,281 --> 00:42:14,632 It's one 1035 00:42:14,632 --> 00:42:18,085 thing to that which is that we picked this field 1036 00:42:18,085 --> 00:42:21,322 just for the the wavefront sensing calibration. 1037 00:42:21,322 --> 00:42:23,424 It was not chosen for these galaxies, 1038 00:42:23,424 --> 00:42:25,676 but all the data we're taking and commissioning 1039 00:42:25,676 --> 00:42:26,877 is going to be public 1040 00:42:26,877 --> 00:42:29,213 when we get to the end of commissioning in June. 1041 00:42:29,580 --> 00:42:32,516 And so, you know, scientists out there, 1042 00:42:32,750 --> 00:42:34,401 their grad students at some university 1043 00:42:34,401 --> 00:42:36,470 can download these data in June and start 1044 00:42:36,470 --> 00:42:39,056 answering these questions from this and all the other data 1045 00:42:39,206 --> 00:42:41,692 that's taken during this commissioning process. 1046 00:42:41,692 --> 00:42:44,028 June or July, we get to where we get done. 1047 00:42:44,028 --> 00:42:44,328 Yeah. 1048 00:42:44,545 --> 00:42:48,032 When we when we get past that, all of the calibration data, 1049 00:42:48,032 --> 00:42:48,832 including the 1050 00:42:48,832 --> 00:42:52,052 these images around the fine phase and target 1051 00:42:52,052 --> 00:42:53,604 in multiple wavelengths, we're just going 1052 00:42:53,604 --> 00:42:55,923 to let that data out to the scientific community 1053 00:42:55,923 --> 00:42:57,174 along with those other observations. 1054 00:42:58,459 --> 00:42:58,892 All right. 1055 00:42:58,892 --> 00:43:01,345 We are going to take a few of our social media questions now. 1056 00:43:01,345 --> 00:43:02,696 We'll take two. 1057 00:43:02,696 --> 00:43:06,150 The first one is to guarantee on Instagram asks, 1058 00:43:06,383 --> 00:43:09,503 what is the precision between the mirror segments 1059 00:43:09,737 --> 00:43:12,239 now that they are aligned when it comes to the alignment 1060 00:43:14,608 --> 00:43:15,542 Well, do you want to talk to that? 1061 00:43:15,542 --> 00:43:17,711 We in your presentation. 1062 00:43:19,146 --> 00:43:22,916 Oh, so our actuators have a resolution. 1063 00:43:22,916 --> 00:43:25,819 We can move and maintain a motor position 1064 00:43:26,370 --> 00:43:28,372 to about nine to ten nanometers. 1065 00:43:28,706 --> 00:43:31,191 So that's our capability 1066 00:43:32,042 --> 00:43:33,711 and our sensing requirements. 1067 00:43:33,711 --> 00:43:36,480 And our sensing budget means that our we aren't 1068 00:43:36,480 --> 00:43:38,899 actually within ten nanometer segment to segment, 1069 00:43:40,284 --> 00:43:42,603 but we're I think we're down to 40 1070 00:43:43,437 --> 00:43:45,739 where we're below 100 meters easily. 1071 00:43:45,756 --> 00:43:45,956 Yeah. 1072 00:43:45,956 --> 00:43:46,790 We're nothing 1073 00:43:46,790 --> 00:43:49,710 that's over the whole whole telescoping range instruments. 1074 00:43:49,710 --> 00:43:51,862 Whole system with a full system. Yeah. 1075 00:43:51,962 --> 00:43:53,297 So each individual segment 1076 00:43:53,297 --> 00:43:56,300 to the other segment is well under 100 nanometers 1077 00:43:59,253 --> 00:43:59,820 Great. 1078 00:43:59,820 --> 00:44:03,290 Our second social media question is from Brian and 1079 00:44:04,375 --> 00:44:07,311 Brian in motion on Twitter, 1080 00:44:07,378 --> 00:44:10,948 who asks, what, if any, are the lessons learned from Web 1081 00:44:10,948 --> 00:44:13,917 so far that we can take into the next space telescope? 1082 00:44:14,218 --> 00:44:16,253 Are there any things that could be done differently? 1083 00:44:16,920 --> 00:44:17,388 Yeah, 1084 00:44:18,188 --> 00:44:20,958 You know, one thing about Web, I mean, obviously 1085 00:44:20,958 --> 00:44:22,559 it's a super cold telescope, 1086 00:44:22,559 --> 00:44:24,895 and that really drove a lot of the design. 1087 00:44:25,462 --> 00:44:28,582 Of course, that huge sunshield was needed to cool things down, 1088 00:44:28,982 --> 00:44:32,002 but it's also a passively thermal telescope. 1089 00:44:32,002 --> 00:44:35,723 And what that means is that unlike, for example, 1090 00:44:35,723 --> 00:44:36,557 the Keck telescope, 1091 00:44:36,557 --> 00:44:38,158 which is a ground telescope in Hawaii 1092 00:44:38,158 --> 00:44:40,411 where they actively move mirrors, 1093 00:44:40,411 --> 00:44:42,930 the web mirrors are designed to be to always 1094 00:44:42,930 --> 00:44:44,248 just kind of be where they are. 1095 00:44:44,248 --> 00:44:46,767 And then only every few days do we update them. 1096 00:44:47,151 --> 00:44:49,820 And that made a lot of sense for a really cold telescope, 1097 00:44:49,820 --> 00:44:52,806 but it also made it difficult to prove the telescope 1098 00:44:52,806 --> 00:44:53,757 was going to work 1099 00:44:53,757 --> 00:44:55,109 and to design everything 1100 00:44:55,109 --> 00:44:57,478 from the mirrors to the structure that holds it. 1101 00:44:57,478 --> 00:44:59,279 And so one of the things that we think 1102 00:44:59,279 --> 00:45:01,732 in the future for these large segmented telescopes 1103 00:45:01,999 --> 00:45:04,334 is we will make use of the types of things 1104 00:45:04,334 --> 00:45:06,537 that ground telescopes have which are active controls 1105 00:45:06,837 --> 00:45:09,289 and that would make our ability to test it easier 1106 00:45:09,440 --> 00:45:11,909 and it would make it make us also be able to make it 1107 00:45:11,909 --> 00:45:15,145 even finer telescope, which some of the future observatories 1108 00:45:15,145 --> 00:45:18,716 may want to do for example, if you want to study exoplanets, 1109 00:45:19,383 --> 00:45:21,418 particularly Earth like planets around stars, 1110 00:45:21,418 --> 00:45:23,387 which is one of the future missions 1111 00:45:23,387 --> 00:45:26,490 that has been recommended by a National Academy Committee, 1112 00:45:26,690 --> 00:45:27,207 You're going to need 1113 00:45:27,207 --> 00:45:29,960 a very precise mirror service that's extremely stable. 1114 00:45:30,260 --> 00:45:31,612 And so we are going to probably 1115 00:45:31,612 --> 00:45:34,131 want to migrate from this sort of approach 1116 00:45:34,131 --> 00:45:37,251 we took for this very cold teles 1117 00:45:39,470 --> 00:45:39,920 All right. 1118 00:45:39,920 --> 00:45:40,137 We are 1119 00:45:40,137 --> 00:45:42,656 going to move back to the media questions on the phone line. 1120 00:45:42,656 --> 00:45:45,259 We'll take the next question, please. 1121 00:45:45,259 --> 00:45:46,727 And as a reminder, to ask 1122 00:45:46,727 --> 00:45:49,012 a question over the phone, please press star one 1123 00:45:49,263 --> 00:45:52,132 Our next question comes from Ken Kramer from Space Up Close. 1124 00:45:52,533 --> 00:45:54,618 The line is now open 1125 00:45:55,853 --> 00:45:57,438 and vacillations 1126 00:45:57,438 --> 00:46:00,057 on the face itself so far. 1127 00:46:00,057 --> 00:46:01,442 One thing that was really good 1128 00:46:01,442 --> 00:46:03,293 to know was about the amount of cooling, 1129 00:46:03,293 --> 00:46:06,747 how far you almost felt like you're at 90 k now. 1130 00:46:07,281 --> 00:46:10,667 Oh, I'm going to take you to get the seventh day, 1131 00:46:10,734 --> 00:46:14,488 which is the fall and winter 1132 00:46:15,439 --> 00:46:18,075 I want to talk about the commissioning of the space. 1133 00:46:18,509 --> 00:46:20,878 When you get to that. Thank you. 1134 00:46:20,878 --> 00:46:21,779 I'm going to repeat that. 1135 00:46:21,779 --> 00:46:23,297 That can because was a little hard to hear you. 1136 00:46:23,297 --> 00:46:25,532 And here I think the question was how long to get 1137 00:46:25,532 --> 00:46:28,469 from where we are now to the seven degrees Kelvin. 1138 00:46:29,102 --> 00:46:31,772 And also to talk a little bit more about science 1139 00:46:31,772 --> 00:46:33,740 commissioning, commissioning of the science instruments. 1140 00:46:33,740 --> 00:46:34,975 Correct. Yeah. 1141 00:46:34,975 --> 00:46:36,593 I mean, yes, that's it. Thank you. 1142 00:46:36,593 --> 00:46:37,494 Great. Thank you. 1143 00:46:38,545 --> 00:46:40,948 So so the cooling process 1144 00:46:41,882 --> 00:46:44,334 takes a couple of weeks and and so 1145 00:46:44,334 --> 00:46:45,769 and we actually will be using 1146 00:46:45,769 --> 00:46:48,572 once we have that Mid-infrared instrument 1147 00:46:49,072 --> 00:46:52,009 fully operational, we actually will use it 1148 00:46:52,009 --> 00:46:54,812 to make sure that the telescopes bounce sort of the last step, 1149 00:46:55,496 --> 00:46:56,730 which, you know, our target 1150 00:46:56,730 --> 00:46:58,048 was to finish in the end of April, 1151 00:46:58,048 --> 00:47:00,200 but it takes a couple of weeks to do the cool down 1152 00:47:00,200 --> 00:47:01,802 roughly ten to 14 days. 1153 00:47:01,802 --> 00:47:05,122 And then as we stabilize it, we'll start taking images 1154 00:47:05,372 --> 00:47:06,840 and make sure everything is working right. 1155 00:47:06,840 --> 00:47:08,058 There's a few different transitions 1156 00:47:08,058 --> 00:47:10,577 that it goes under as it cools down. So. 1157 00:47:10,627 --> 00:47:12,746 So it's a couple of process. 1158 00:47:12,746 --> 00:47:15,065 The detail that the 1159 00:47:15,065 --> 00:47:19,203 the cooler has its own complicated calibration process. 1160 00:47:19,203 --> 00:47:21,205 Usually the telescope has a multistep process. 1161 00:47:21,205 --> 00:47:23,457 This is not just a refrigerator 1162 00:47:23,457 --> 00:47:24,658 that you turn on, but has its own. 1163 00:47:24,658 --> 00:47:27,261 I think it's a six step process and be there right now on the 1164 00:47:27,361 --> 00:47:29,363 the third stage of that cool down process. 1165 00:47:29,363 --> 00:47:31,281 The fourth stage will begin about a week from now. 1166 00:47:31,281 --> 00:47:33,517 And that's really going to accelerate the cooling of memory 1167 00:47:36,503 --> 00:47:36,870 And then 1168 00:47:36,870 --> 00:47:37,638 we really address 1169 00:47:37,638 --> 00:47:39,506 the what's happening, the science commissioning next 1170 00:47:39,506 --> 00:47:40,340 with the commissioning instruments. 1171 00:47:40,340 --> 00:47:42,392 You want to mention just what our next steps are. 1172 00:47:42,809 --> 00:47:44,027 Yeah, it was just what's happening 1173 00:47:44,027 --> 00:47:46,263 next for commissioning of the science instruments. 1174 00:47:47,848 --> 00:47:49,533 We have covered some of that. 1175 00:47:49,533 --> 00:47:50,000 Let's see. 1176 00:47:50,000 --> 00:47:51,718 So science instruments 1177 00:47:51,718 --> 00:47:54,137 mirror has to get cold that is the really big one. 1178 00:47:55,022 --> 00:47:57,958 We're walking through the for each instrument. 1179 00:47:57,958 --> 00:48:00,227 There's a set of 1180 00:48:01,762 --> 00:48:03,146 of activities 1181 00:48:03,146 --> 00:48:05,549 that each one has to show that it is working. 1182 00:48:05,883 --> 00:48:08,569 And it's things like stepping through the filter wheel 1183 00:48:08,569 --> 00:48:10,320 and making sure that you get every position, 1184 00:48:10,320 --> 00:48:13,140 the filter wheel that you want, getting the darks because 1185 00:48:13,140 --> 00:48:16,443 when you're when to understand the properties of the detector 1186 00:48:16,443 --> 00:48:19,346 so that we can take that out so that we're seeing the sky 1187 00:48:19,346 --> 00:48:22,232 and not what the not what the detectors are doing. 1188 00:48:22,916 --> 00:48:26,186 So there's doing so we're doing every step 1189 00:48:26,186 --> 00:48:28,972 in that to get those instruments ready for science. 1190 00:48:30,691 --> 00:48:31,191 Thank you. 1191 00:48:31,191 --> 00:48:33,060 We are taking two more media questions. 1192 00:48:33,060 --> 00:48:35,512 We'll take the next one, please. 1193 00:48:35,696 --> 00:48:38,815 Our next question comes from Irene Klotz from Aviation Week. 1194 00:48:38,849 --> 00:48:40,817 Your line is now open. 1195 00:48:41,184 --> 00:48:42,352 Thanks very much. 1196 00:48:42,352 --> 00:48:43,503 I have two questions. 1197 00:48:43,503 --> 00:48:46,790 Well, one question for Jane and then for Thomas. 1198 00:48:47,691 --> 00:48:50,177 Are you seeing any impacts in the GWC 1199 00:48:50,277 --> 00:48:52,796 science community? 1200 00:48:52,946 --> 00:48:55,365 Over the situation in Ukraine? 1201 00:48:55,382 --> 00:48:59,152 Are there any Russian astronomers, astrophysicists 1202 00:48:59,152 --> 00:49:01,672 involved in any of that first year science 1203 00:49:02,039 --> 00:49:04,458 and for Thomas, can you address that same question 1204 00:49:04,458 --> 00:49:06,743 more generally to the NASA science program? 1205 00:49:06,977 --> 00:49:09,429 Thanks. So thank you, Irene. 1206 00:49:09,446 --> 00:49:09,980 Unfortunately, 1207 00:49:09,980 --> 00:49:11,782 I'm going to have to circle up with you afterwards 1208 00:49:11,782 --> 00:49:12,716 we're going to try and stick 1209 00:49:12,716 --> 00:49:14,718 to some of the science and the alignment right now. 1210 00:49:14,901 --> 00:49:15,602 But I will get you 1211 00:49:15,602 --> 00:49:17,521 any information, an update on statements we have. 1212 00:49:17,521 --> 00:49:19,189 So I'll circle up with you as soon as we're done here. 1213 00:49:20,390 --> 00:49:20,691 If you 1214 00:49:20,691 --> 00:49:23,327 have another question, I would take it, 1215 00:49:23,327 --> 00:49:26,096 otherwise we can go to the next one. 1216 00:49:26,530 --> 00:49:27,948 Oh, couldn't Thomas not address 1217 00:49:27,948 --> 00:49:29,883 that question either? 1218 00:49:30,834 --> 00:49:31,952 Yeah, well, we'll stick to 1219 00:49:31,952 --> 00:49:34,471 to responding offline 1220 00:49:35,989 --> 00:49:36,840 Thank you. 1221 00:49:36,840 --> 00:49:39,559 And our next question comes from Daniel 1222 00:49:40,127 --> 00:49:43,380 Lara from our drone UI. 1223 00:49:43,430 --> 00:49:46,083 Your line is now open Hi. 1224 00:49:46,083 --> 00:49:46,850 How are you doing? 1225 00:49:46,850 --> 00:49:49,703 And thank you for this excellent relations. 1226 00:49:49,803 --> 00:49:52,622 Well, I think this question would be for Thomas 1227 00:49:53,040 --> 00:49:55,125 and even the little time would with 1228 00:49:55,125 --> 00:49:57,144 this beautiful telescope. 1229 00:49:57,594 --> 00:50:01,198 And it would be doing some plans 1230 00:50:01,198 --> 00:50:04,167 to review the telescope to get more 1231 00:50:05,719 --> 00:50:08,071 lifetime on this 1232 00:50:10,607 --> 00:50:13,460 So you're you're right that we're every time 1233 00:50:13,460 --> 00:50:16,046 we build a telescope, we think about how long we can 1234 00:50:16,380 --> 00:50:17,064 operate it. 1235 00:50:17,064 --> 00:50:19,466 I want to tell you that that delivery 1236 00:50:19,966 --> 00:50:23,754 by Arianespace and the European Space Agency was just fabulous. 1237 00:50:23,754 --> 00:50:26,873 Frankly, the lifetime of the telescope 1238 00:50:26,873 --> 00:50:31,311 that we initially said you know, about a decade or so 1239 00:50:31,311 --> 00:50:32,913 is, we believe, exceed 1240 00:50:32,913 --> 00:50:36,383 it based on what we see there as we're kind of learning 1241 00:50:36,383 --> 00:50:39,619 how to operate and point in sky, 1242 00:50:40,187 --> 00:50:42,239 the estimates of the lifetime 1243 00:50:42,239 --> 00:50:44,057 will really become more accurate. 1244 00:50:44,057 --> 00:50:46,193 So as we come to the end of commissioning, 1245 00:50:46,193 --> 00:50:48,979 I'm sure we'll get far much more accurate update. 1246 00:50:48,979 --> 00:50:51,898 I don't know whether there's anything you can say already 1247 00:50:51,898 --> 00:50:54,201 now that you haven't already said you were the person 1248 00:50:54,501 --> 00:50:54,985 who talked 1249 00:50:54,985 --> 00:50:57,587 about Lifetime before, but that's what's on our mind. 1250 00:50:57,687 --> 00:50:59,790 I think that I think Mike mentioned 1251 00:50:59,790 --> 00:51:00,807 during one of the meeting, 1252 00:51:00,807 --> 00:51:04,644 one of the press events that he thought it would be 20 years. 1253 00:51:04,644 --> 00:51:07,714 And the one thing I can add is that on the actuation 1254 00:51:07,864 --> 00:51:10,550 you know, we they have a, they will last 1255 00:51:10,550 --> 00:51:13,136 as long as the rest of the observatory. 1256 00:51:13,370 --> 00:51:15,722 They're working exactly the way we expected. 1257 00:51:15,989 --> 00:51:17,374 They have a very long lifetime. 1258 00:51:17,374 --> 00:51:19,376 So there's, there's no changes to anything 1259 00:51:19,426 --> 00:51:21,895 in the sense of the lifetime of the system. 1260 00:51:22,813 --> 00:51:23,063 Yeah. 1261 00:51:23,063 --> 00:51:24,648 And I don't think there's any new updates. 1262 00:51:24,648 --> 00:51:27,150 But as Thomas mentioned, as we go through commissioning 1263 00:51:27,150 --> 00:51:28,819 there might be some other additional updates 1264 00:51:28,819 --> 00:51:29,786 from the systems team 1265 00:51:31,855 --> 00:51:32,189 Okay. 1266 00:51:32,189 --> 00:51:34,341 Is this opportunity to make a new question? 1267 00:51:35,759 --> 00:51:37,561 I think we do have time. Yes. 1268 00:51:37,561 --> 00:51:38,762 Go right ahead. 1269 00:51:39,830 --> 00:51:40,614 Okay. 1270 00:51:40,764 --> 00:51:44,868 What will be the next target of the when science 1271 00:51:45,168 --> 00:51:48,321 starts on inside the solar system? 1272 00:51:50,390 --> 00:51:53,009 Inside the solar system. 1273 00:51:53,009 --> 00:51:54,628 There is an early release 1274 00:51:54,628 --> 00:51:57,197 science program to study 1275 00:51:57,931 --> 00:52:00,317 either Jupiter, Saturn to study them, 1276 00:52:00,951 --> 00:52:02,969 to study the gas giants 1277 00:52:02,969 --> 00:52:05,489 in our own solar system and in particular, their moons. 1278 00:52:05,839 --> 00:52:09,092 So there is a program to do that that has been competitively 1279 00:52:09,092 --> 00:52:10,944 selected and is in the queue. 1280 00:52:10,944 --> 00:52:13,113 We are doing some commissioning activities 1281 00:52:13,313 --> 00:52:17,267 to go double check that we can look at a target 1282 00:52:17,267 --> 00:52:21,087 as bright as a planet in our own solar system and still be able 1283 00:52:21,087 --> 00:52:25,142 to point at and get data on the nearby orbiting moons. 1284 00:52:26,910 --> 00:52:26,993 Well, 1285 00:52:26,993 --> 00:52:31,281 there are also some approved programs to do Trojan asteroids, 1286 00:52:31,731 --> 00:52:34,501 and there's an approved program to study 1287 00:52:34,668 --> 00:52:36,653 those asteroids that are interstellar visitors 1288 00:52:36,653 --> 00:52:37,621 from our solar system, 1289 00:52:37,621 --> 00:52:40,190 from other asteroids that have come in from outside 1290 00:52:40,190 --> 00:52:41,308 our solar system. 1291 00:52:41,308 --> 00:52:42,092 Right, Jane. 1292 00:52:42,092 --> 00:52:44,995 And of course, the reason these are such a high priority 1293 00:52:44,995 --> 00:52:47,597 and they did so well in the reviews is, of course, 1294 00:52:48,114 --> 00:52:50,333 as we have other missions actually 1295 00:52:50,333 --> 00:52:52,102 exploring the solar system, 1296 00:52:52,102 --> 00:52:53,486 the information that we can get 1297 00:52:53,486 --> 00:52:56,156 from this amazing telescope, but really help us run 1298 00:52:56,156 --> 00:52:57,390 these missions better. 1299 00:52:57,390 --> 00:53:00,093 Lucy is on its way to the very, 1300 00:53:00,093 --> 00:53:02,279 very bodies that you just talked about. 1301 00:53:02,279 --> 00:53:05,282 And yesterday, I met with the Clipper team 1302 00:53:05,282 --> 00:53:07,851 that of course, is going to launch in 24, 1303 00:53:07,851 --> 00:53:09,920 that amazing mission to go to Europe, 1304 00:53:09,920 --> 00:53:12,422 which is one of those moments that you just talked about. 1305 00:53:14,541 --> 00:53:14,808 Thank 1306 00:53:14,808 --> 00:53:17,427 you so much to everybody who has watched today 1307 00:53:17,427 --> 00:53:18,078 who was on the line 1308 00:53:18,078 --> 00:53:20,730 asking questions and who has talked to us today. 1309 00:53:21,081 --> 00:53:22,949 We are going to finish up now. 1310 00:53:22,949 --> 00:53:26,486 You can follow along and learn more about this 1311 00:53:26,486 --> 00:53:27,320 amazing telescope 1312 00:53:27,320 --> 00:53:28,488 and what's coming up this summer 1313 00:53:28,488 --> 00:53:29,873 and all of the incredible science 1314 00:53:29,873 --> 00:53:33,360 that we have talked about here today on nasa.gov slash web. 1315 00:53:33,360 --> 00:53:35,328 That's Web. 1316 00:53:35,328 --> 00:53:37,847 You can also follow along on the social media conversation 1317 00:53:37,847 --> 00:53:40,367 using hashtag unfold the universe. 1318 00:53:40,650 --> 00:53:44,371 And of course, nasa.gov is going to tell you all about the way 1319 00:53:44,371 --> 00:53:46,289 that Web interacts with all these other 1320 00:53:46,289 --> 00:53:47,757 incredible science missions and all that 1321 00:53:47,757 --> 00:53:50,994 we're doing in the solar system and beyond. 1322 00:53:51,228 --> 00:53:54,080 Thank you so much for being here today. 1323 00:53:54,080 --> 00:53:54,497 Goodbye.