1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:01,935
[Music throughout]

2
00:00:01,935 --> 00:00:04,537
NASA's Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope

3
00:00:04,537 --> 00:00:08,641
watches the sky for gamma
rays, the highest-energy form of light.

4
00:00:08,742 --> 00:00:10,877
These detections
help scientists learn more

5
00:00:10,877 --> 00:00:13,880
about the most powerful events
in the cosmos.

6
00:00:14,047 --> 00:00:17,217
However, a recent absence of gamma ray
detection

7
00:00:17,450 --> 00:00:19,652
may have been just as informative.

8
00:00:19,652 --> 00:00:22,522
Cosmic rays are small particles,
like protons

9
00:00:22,522 --> 00:00:26,226
and helium nuclei, traveling at nearly
the speed of light.

10
00:00:26,292 --> 00:00:29,763
It takes a lot of energy to accelerate 
them to that speed,

11
00:00:29,829 --> 00:00:32,665
so scientists assume they're driven by powerful events

12
00:00:32,665 --> 00:00:36,369
like exploding stars called supernovae.

13
00:00:36,436 --> 00:00:38,605
Because cosmic rays are charged particles,

14
00:00:38,605 --> 00:00:41,608
they interact with magnetic fields as they travel.

15
00:00:41,841 --> 00:00:45,412
These interactions mean they don't follow
a straight line from their sources,

16
00:00:45,512 --> 00:00:48,515
and so scientists can't trace where they came from.

17
00:00:48,648 --> 00:00:53,286
But when cosmic rays smash into other particles, 
they produce gamma rays.

18
00:00:53,453 --> 00:00:56,990
And gamma rays do travel to us
straight from their sources.

19
00:00:57,290 --> 00:01:01,061
Fermi has even detected such gamma rays
from supernova remnants,

20
00:01:01,161 --> 00:01:03,963
which are thousands of years old.

21
00:01:03,963 --> 00:01:08,034
If supernovae and their remnants
really are a key source of cosmic rays,

22
00:01:08,101 --> 00:01:12,605
then calculations tell astronomers how many 
gamma rays Fermi should detect.

23
00:01:12,705 --> 00:01:15,075
But so far, the telescope hasn't

24
00:01:15,075 --> 00:01:18,378
seen enough gamma rays from these sources.

25
00:01:18,445 --> 00:01:22,148
Scientists had suspected this was because
supernovae were too far away,

26
00:01:22,315 --> 00:01:26,119
or observations began too late,
well after peak production.

27
00:01:27,954 --> 00:01:31,724
In May 2023, Fermi observed the most luminous nearby

28
00:01:31,724 --> 00:01:35,495
supernova seen since the mission launched
15 years ago.

29
00:01:35,562 --> 00:01:37,430
It captured data from the first few weeks

30
00:01:37,430 --> 00:01:38,465
of the explosion,

31
00:01:38,832 --> 00:01:40,467
when scientists anticipated

32
00:01:40,467 --> 00:01:43,069
the greatest production of cosmic rays.

33
00:01:43,136 --> 00:01:45,004
But Fermi didn't see any gamma rays

34
00:01:45,004 --> 00:01:46,706
 from the explosion.

35
00:01:47,373 --> 00:01:49,476
Scientists aren't yet sure what this means

36
00:01:49,476 --> 00:01:51,945
for the link between cosmic rays and supernovae.

37
00:01:52,011 --> 00:01:54,514
There's still a lot of work left to do.

38
00:01:54,514 --> 00:01:58,718
But Fermi's non-detection has added a 
very important new piece

39
00:01:58,718 --> 00:02:00,520
to this high-energy puzzle.

40
00:02:00,887 --> 00:02:03,189
[Music fades]

41
00:02:03,690 --> 00:02:06,159
NASA